Difference between revisions of "Wythe the Lawyer"
m (→General Court cases) |
m |
||
(14 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | [[File:SilvetteWythe1979.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Portrait by David Silvette (1979), [ | + | [[File:SilvetteWythe1979.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Portrait by David Silvette (1979), [https://law.wm.edu/ College of William & Mary Law School.]]] |
− | George Wythe may be best known | + | George Wythe may be best known as a signer of the [[Declaration of Independence]], a [[Wythe's Judicial Career|judge on the High Court of Chancery]], and for training some of the most influential legal minds of the 18th century at William & Mary, but before doing any of those things, Wythe had spent decades as a successful lawyer. Like most of what we know about Wythe's life, what we know about his legal career does not come from Wythe himself. Instead, we must rely on contemporaneous letters and newspapers as well as what cases we can find in county court records and Thomas Jefferson's case notes.<ref>Source material on George Wythe's early career is scant, at best. See Kirtland, ''George Wythe: Lawyer, Revolutionary, Judge'' (New York: Garland, 1986).</ref> From these sources, however, we can sketch the contours of a successful legal career that extended over 30 years. |
− | At the time Wythe entered the profession, legal training varied and was not as regimented as it is today. Often men who wanted to | + | At the time Wythe entered the profession, legal training varied and was not as regimented as it is today. Often men who wanted to become lawyers apprenticed with a practicing attorney.<ref>Frank L. Dewey, ''Thomas Jefferson Lawyer'' (Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press, 1987), 3.</ref> George Wythe's education was typical of the times. His first teacher was likely his mother, who taught him reading, writing, and arithmetic. There is conjecture that he attended William & Mary for some formal education between 1730 and 1735,<ref>William Edwin Hemphill, "[[George Wythe the Colonial Briton|George Wythe the Colonial Briton: A Biographical Study of Pre-Revolutionary Era in Virginia]]," 34 (citing the ''History of the College of William and Mary from its Foundation, 1660 to 1874,'' 84).</ref> but he would not have studied law there..<ref>Kirtland, 36-37.</ref> He began his formal training by apprenticinging under his uncle, Stephen Dewey — the husband of his mother's sister — in Prince George County.<ref>Kirtland, 40; see also Dewey, 3.</ref> Dewey was a justice of the peace and served as member of the House of Burgesses.<ref>See Hemphill, 36. Both positions Wythe would later also hold.</ref> |
− | When reflecting on this experience later in life, Wythe suggested that this apprenticeship was more about clerk work and printing duties than it was about actually learning the practice of law.<ref>Hemphill, 37; Kirtland, 40-41.</ref> This | + | When reflecting on this experience later in life, Wythe suggested that this apprenticeship was more about clerk work and printing duties than it was about actually learning the practice of law.<ref>Hemphill, 37; Kirtland, 40-41.</ref> This leads some scholars to suggest that the experience informed Wythe's commitment to training prospective attorneys differently later in his life, both when he had apprentices and when he became the nation's first law professor.<ref>Hemphill, 38.</ref> Although we do not know details of Wythe's day to day routine while apprenticing under his uncle, we can assume that he would have had access to his uncle's legal library.<ref>Hemphill, 38.</ref><ref>Kirtland, 40-41.</ref> |
==Early legal career (1746 – 1754)== | ==Early legal career (1746 – 1754)== | ||
− | It is not until 1745 | + | It is not until 1745 that a law appears in colonial Virginia regarding requirements for admission to the legal bar.<ref>Hemphill, 41 (citing Henning ''Statutes'').</ref> Wythe became licensed under these requirements and admitted to the bar in 1746. A copy of Wythe's law license exists in the order books of Augusta County records and his license was signed by Peyton Randolph, St. Lawrence Burford, Stephen Dewey, and William Nimmo.<ref>Hemphill, 42 (citing entry of May 21, 1747, Order Book No. 1, 196, Augusta County Records.</ref> Once licensed, attorneys could practice in county courts but had to be admitted to each court they wished to practice in. Several county courts admitted Wythe in 1746 and 1747, including Elizabeth City and Spotsylvania.<ref>Hemphill, 42. For record of Elizabeth County admission see June 18, 1746, minutes in Order Book, 1731-1747, 489, Elizabeth County Records. For Spotsylvania County admission, see November 4, 1746, Orders, 1738-1749, 395, Spotsylvania County Records; see also Kirtland, 42.</ref> |
− | [[File: | + | [[File:Complaint5Nov1746RussellVDowde.jpg|right|thumb|500px|<center>Complaint, November 5, 1746, of William Russell against Thomas Dowde, in Orange County, Virginia Court. Special Collections, Wolf Law Library, College of William & Mary.</center>]] |
− | + | A new member of the bar and in his early 20s, Wythe moved to western Virginia, specifically to Spotsylvania County. Very quickly, Caroline, Orange, and Augusta counties admitted him to practice.<ref>Hemphill, 43-46 (qualified in Carolina County in February of 1747 and Augusta/Staunton in May of 1747); see also Kirtland, 42.</ref> Most county court attorneys "rode the circuits" in various counties so it is likely that Wythe qualified in other counties in the area as well, such as Albemarle and Louisa, but there are no official records documenting his work in these or other counties.<ref>Hemphill, 45.</ref> During his years as an attorney in western Virginia, Wythe befriended and worked alongside Zachary Lewis of Spotsylvania, which aided his success as a young lawyer.<ref>Zachary Lewis also becomes Wythe's father-in-law. Horace Edwin Hayden, ''[[Virginia Genealogies]]'' (Wilkes-Barre, PA: E.B. Yordy, 1891), 381-382.</ref> Wythe's case load would have covered a wide range of issues, including criminal, civil, and chancery cases, and work on the western circuits would have encompassed the vast territory that was western Virginia at the time (including what is today West Virginia, Kentucky, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, and Wisconsin).<ref>Hemphill, 48-49.</ref> | |
− | Wythe remained a county court attorney in western Virginia until 1748 when he moved back to Williamsburg or the Elizabeth County area.<ref>There is some speculation that Wythe moves back home because of the death of his first wife, Ann Lewis. Hemphill, 52.</ref> Upon | + | Wythe remained a county court attorney in western Virginia until 1748 when he moved back to Williamsburg or the Elizabeth County area.<ref>There is some speculation that Wythe moves back home because of the death of his first wife, Ann Lewis. Hemphill, 52.</ref> Upon returning to the capital area, Wythe began his parallel career as a politician when the House of Burgesses selected him to serve as clerk to two standing committees.<ref>Hemphill, 55.</ref> He stayed in this role until the governor, in January 1754, appointed him interim Attorney General for Virginia while the current Attorney General, Peyton Randolph, was in England advocating for the Colony to the Crown. Wythe served as Attorney General through December 1754.<ref>Hemphill, 66-71.</ref> |
− | It is assumed that Wythe continued to ride the circuits of nearby counties such as James City, York, New Kent, and Charles City | + | It is assumed that Wythe continued to ride the circuits of nearby counties such as James City, York, New Kent, and Charles City during this time, though we cannot be sure because court records for these counties have been lost.<ref>Hemphill, 55.</ref> There is evidence, however, of Wythe arguing at least three cases in Warwick County in 1749, so we know he was still practicing as a county court attorney in this period.<ref>Hemphill, 55 (citing entries of April 6, 1749, Minutes, 1748-1762, 29-31, Warwick County Records).</ref> There are also records showing he had clients including John Blair in 1751 and the Custis family in 1754.<ref>Hemphill, 56-57. For John Blair see entries of March 20, 22, October 2, November 7, 1751, ''William and Mary College Quarterly'' 1st Series, VII, 137, VIII, 5, VII, 146, 148; for Custis family see [[1776 Americana|letter from Wythe to Daniel Parke Custis]], April 10, 1754).</ref> Wythe was appointed to the Williamsburg seat in the House of Burgesses in 1754 and provided counsel for candidates in the House of Burgesses that had legal issues within the House.<ref>Hemphill, 57.</ref> |
For the rest of his legal career, Wythe would balance the practice of law with his service in the colonial government. | For the rest of his legal career, Wythe would balance the practice of law with his service in the colonial government. | ||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
==Pre-Revolutionary attorney (1754 – 1778)== | ==Pre-Revolutionary attorney (1754 – 1778)== | ||
− | Sometime between 1754 and 1755, the General Court | + | Sometime between 1754 and 1755, the General Court admitted George Wythe to practice, ending his service on the county court circuit.<ref> The exact date of his appointment is unclear, but Hemphill argues that it was likely sometime before May 1755 because there is a license signed by Wythe for Paul Carrington in 1755, which would have required that Wythe have a license in the General Court. See Hemphill, 77 (citing 1755 license for Paul Carrington).</ref> Between 1755 and 1761, a lawyer could not practice in both county courts and the General Court unless he was a barrister (a person qualified to practice in an English Court). George Wythe chose to practice in the General Court.<ref>Kirtland, 45; Dewey, 2,4.</ref> |
− | Unlike the county courts, the General Court was a superior court located exclusively in Williamsburg.<ref>Dewey, 3.</ref> The General Court handled appellate cases that rose out of county court decisions.<ref>Kirtland, 45.</ref> Very few attorneys served on this court and | + | [[File:VirginiaCounties1761-1770.jpg|thumb|right|500px|Map of Virginia counties for 1761 – 1770, from Michael F. Doran's ''Atlas of County Boundary Changes in Virginia, 1634-1895'' (Athens, GA: Iberian Pub. Co., 1987). Wythe was admitted as an attorney in County Court in Augusta, Caroline, Elizabeth City, Orange, Spotsylvania, and Warwick Counties, and possibly also in Albemarle, Charles City, James City, Louisa, New Kent, and York Counties.]] |
+ | Unlike the county courts, the General Court was a superior court located exclusively in Williamsburg.<ref>Dewey, 3.</ref> The General Court handled appellate cases that rose out of county court decisions as well as original cases.<ref>Kirtland, 45.</ref> Very few attorneys served on this court and Wythe practiced alongside some of the top attorneys in Virginia including Peyton Randolph, Robert Carter Nicholas, and Edmund Pendleton.<ref>Hemphill, 84.</ref> One reason scholars have considered General Court attorneys the best of the best is because three attorneys from the court — Wythe, Pendleton, and Nicholas — were immediately elected to high judgeships after the Revolution.<ref>Dewey, 7.</ref> Wythe served on the General Court until start of the Revolution.<ref>Kirtland, 45.</ref> | ||
− | + | As he did through most of his life, Wythe kept additional responsibilities while simultaneously licensed in the General Court. He served as the Elizabeth City County Justice of the Peace in Chesterfield from 1755 until sometime in the 1760s.<ref>Hemphill, 75 (citing Order Book, 1775—1776, Elizabeth City County Records).</ref> Likewise, beginning in 1758, Wythe served on the examination board for the General Court and signed licenses for practitioners such as Patrick Henry.<ref>Hemphill, 106 (citing Tyler's Quarterly Magazine, IX, 97). Also signed the licenses of Peter Hog. Hemphill, 106 (citing Brock, ed., Records of Dinwiddie, I, 470, n.); Dewey, 118.</ref> Wythe continued serving on this examination board until 1772.<ref>Hemphill, 105; Dewey, 118.</ref> Wythe's political career also accelerated during this period as he served as Interim Attorney General (January 1754—December 1754),<ref>Kirtland, 46. </ref> William & Mary appointed Burgess (1758—1761),<ref>Hemphill, 166-167.</ref> Elizabeth County Burgess Representative (1761—1767),<ref>Hemphill, 170.</ref> appointed Clerk of the House (1768—1774), Mayor of Williamsburg (1770—1771),<ref>Hemphill, 258 (citing Virginia Gazette, pub. By Purdie and Dixon, December 3, 1772); Kirtland, 49.</ref> and Williamsburg Alderman (? —1772).<ref>Hemphill, 258.</ref> | |
− | Although Wythe was never only practicing law, the legal practice he shared with Robert Carter Nicholas flourished in the 1750s and 1760s.<ref>Hemphill, 258.</ref> Business records from Elizabeth County suggest that he was financially successful because he could afford to expand his property ownership.<ref>Hemphill, 104.</ref> He | + | Although Wythe was never only practicing law, the legal practice he shared with Robert Carter Nicholas flourished in the 1750s and 1760s.<ref>Hemphill, 258.</ref> Business records from Elizabeth County suggest that he was financially successful because he could afford to expand his property ownership.<ref>Hemphill, 104.</ref> He served as attorney for George Washington twice during this period and again much later in 1773.<ref>Hemphill, 102 (citing Robert Carter Nicholas to George Washington, January 5, 1758, Stanislaus Murray Hamilton, ed., Letters to Washington and Accompanying Papers, II, 256; Entries of April 1 and May 21, 1760, John C. Fitzpatrick ed., The Diaries of George Washington, 1748-1799, I, 147, 163). For later representation see Hemphill, 137 (citing George Wythe to George Washington, December 15, 1773, Hamilton, ed., Letters to Washington, IV, 282-284; George Washington to George Wythe, January 17, 1774, Fitzpatrick, ed., Writings of Washington, III, 174-176; George Washington to John Parke Custis, May 26, 1778, Fitzpatrick, ed., Writings of Washington, XI, 456)</ref> Even when he was appointed the Clerk of the House in 1768, a time-consuming job, Wythe continued to keep up his practice before the General Court.<ref>Kirtland, 96 (stating that Wythe's duties as clerk "were not so arduous as to preclude Wythe's practice before the General Court").</ref> It was also in the 1760s that Wythe apprenticed his most famous future lawyer, Thomas Jefferson,<ref>Hemphill, 114. Jefferson was not the only legal student apprenticed by Wythe at this time. There were others including St. George Tucker. See Hemphill, 146; Kirtland, 97.</ref> who studied under Wythe from 1762 to 1767.<ref>Hemphill, 124.</ref> |
− | Once the General Court licensed Jefferson, he joined Wythe in legal practice, and they worked together until the outbreak of the Revolution in 1775.<ref>Hemphill, 124 (citing | + | Once the General Court licensed Jefferson, he joined Wythe in legal practice, and they worked together until the outbreak of the Revolution in 1775.<ref>Hemphill, 124 (citing "Autobiography," Berg. ed., Writings of Jefferson, I, 4). For General court closing see Hemphill, 149.</ref> Unfortunately, the General Court records have disappeared, but Jefferson was a meticulous note taker, unlike his mentor, and thus, most of the records we have on the cases Wythe executed come from Jefferson's reports during their practice together (1768—1775).<ref>See Thomas Jefferson, Reports of Cases Determined in the General Court of Virginia from 1730 to 1740 and from 1768 to 1772 (Buffalo, NY: William S. Hein & Co., Inc., 1981); see also Hemphill, 130-132; Kirtland, 96.</ref> Even though we know Wythe was on the court from 1755 to 1765, there is very little record of what cases he was a part of during this early period<ref>Hemphill, 10</ref> except some petitions in General Court bearing Wythe's signature or including him as the attorney of record.<ref>See Hemphill, 144 (citing Petition of Achilles Foster, undated, Autograph Collection of the Signers of the Declaration of Independence, Henry E. Huntington Library and Art Gallery; Petition of Solomon Redmon, undated [ca.1772], in the possession of Thomas F. Hadigan Co., New York, December 1936; Petition of John Randolph, February 12, 1773, Gratz Collection, Pennsylvania Historical Society Library).</ref> |
− | Overall, | + | Overall, Wythe's pre-revolutionary career was successful, and he managed to balance both the law and politics until 1775, when all normal legal and political activity ceased due to the Revolution.<ref>Kirtland, 97-98.</ref> The General Court had its last session in 1775.<ref>Hemphill, 149.</ref> Wythe did not know it then, but this would mark the end of his legal career as a practitioner. He would return to court as one of the first to be appointed to a high judgeship in 1778.<ref>Kirtland, 119.</ref> |
− | == | + | ==Wythe's Legal Reputation== |
− | Outside of the specifics of his practice, what do we know about | + | Outside of the specifics of his practice, what do we know about Wythe's reputation as a lawyer? While most of the evidence is either anecdotal from those who were close to him like Jefferson, or written after his death, it seems that overall Wythe was known and respected as a lawyer of skill and integrity. |
− | + | Wythe's presence on the General Court sets him apart as one of the most capable attorneys of the period.<ref>Dewey, 7; Kirtland, 49.</ref> It was often said that Wythe had few equals in the courtroom, outside of Edmund Pendleton whom he repeatedly faced in court and who managed to defeat Wythe often.<ref>Kirtland, 49-51, 59; see also Hemphill, 98.</ref> Both lawyers were well respected and continued to compete for over two decades in the General Court.<ref>Hemphill, 159.</ref> While Wythe was thought to be smarter, Pendleton had a stronger ability to bring forth clever arguments quickly.<ref>Hemphill, 159-161.</ref> But this does not mean that Wythe was less skilled than Pendleton. His knowledge of the law was unmatched — "profound" — as noted in an anonymous letter to a local newspaper after his death.<ref>Hemphill, 150 (citing Anonymous "Communication," ''The Enquirer'', June 10, 1806).</ref> | |
− | Upon his death, many of his contemporaries | + | Upon his death, many of his contemporaries cited Wythe's integrity as the key to his legal practice. One contemporary, Reverend Lee Hassey, stated that Wythe "was the only honest lawyer he ever knew."<ref>Hemphill, 153 (citing J.T. Stoddert, letter to Bishop Heade, reprinted in Heade, op. cit., II, 238).</ref> Jefferson declared that Wythe was "as distinguished by correctness and purity of conduct in his profession, as he was by his industry & fidelity to those who employed him."<ref>Hemphill, 154 (citing Jefferson, "Notes for the Biography of George Wythe," Jefferson Papers, Library of Congress).</ref> It was also said that the temptations of law never succeeded to corrupt Wythe's purity.<ref>Hemphill (citing Randolph, Manuscript History of Virginia, Virginia Historical Magazine, XLIII, 131).</ref> |
− | For example, when accepting cases, Wythe was very intentional about who he would and would not represent, never accepting a case simply for financial or reputational gains.<ref>Hemphill, 154.</ref> As an intake procedure, Wythe required all of his clients to sign affidavits of truth of their testimony and if he later found out they had lied, he would return any money paid and refer them to another attorney.<ref>Hemphill, 154-155 (citing | + | For example, when accepting cases, Wythe was very intentional about who he would and would not represent, never accepting a case simply for financial or reputational gains.<ref>Hemphill, 154.</ref> As an intake procedure, Wythe required all of his clients to sign affidavits of truth of their testimony and if he later found out they had lied, he would return any money paid and refer them to another attorney.<ref>Hemphill, 154-155 (citing "Memoirs of the Late George Wythe, Esquire," The American Gleaner and Virginia Gazette, I, 2-3); see also Kirtland, 58.</ref> |
− | In a printed eulogy upon | + | In a printed eulogy upon Wythe's death, Mason L. Weems told the story of Wythe withdrawing from a client who he believed to be in the wrong and returning his money because Wythe in good conscience could not go on with the suit. The story alleges that Wythe still maintained lawyer-client confidentiality by telling the client "that as conscience will not allow me to say anything for you, honor forbids that I should say anything against you."<ref>Hemphill, 155-156 (citing a reprint from The Charleston, S.C., Times, July 1, 1806, in ''William and Mary College Quarterly'', 1st Series, XXV, 18-19.</ref> Meaning that while Wythe could not move forward in the case and advised the client not to either, he would not stand in the way of the client finding another attorney. There is no written evidence for this exchange, but as an anecdotal story, it seems to comply with other observations of Wythe's career from his contemporaries.<ref>Hemphill, 157.</ref> |
− | Along with his conscientious selection of cases, contemporaries also remembered Wythe to be less concerned about financial success than other attorneys of his day.<ref> | + | Along with his conscientious selection of cases, contemporaries also remembered Wythe to be less concerned about financial success than other attorneys of his day.<ref>Hemphill, 157.</ref> After his death, public reflections about him as a lawyer stated that he would always take the lowest possible fee, and that no persuasion or subterfuge "could induce him to accept a fee beyond the lowest possible value of his labour."<ref>Hemphill, 157, (citing "Communication" signed "A.B." Virginia Gazette, and General Advertiser, June 18, 1806).</ref> |
− | Admittedly, these | + | Admittedly, these assessments of character come after Wythe's death and thus, could be tainted by the desire to remember Wythe in the best light. The consistency of the comments, however, suggest some truth and at the very least Wythe was considered by those who knew him well to be a knowledgeable and skillful lawyer unmatched in his legal integrity. |
==County Court cases== | ==County Court cases== | ||
− | Most attorneys in | + | Most attorneys in colonial Virginia practiced in several county courts, commonly referred to as "riding the circuit."<ref>Dewey, 1.</ref> Qualifications for practicing were set by statute. General Court lawyers examined incoming practitioners and certified their good character for each specific county court in which they wanted to practice. Applicants also had to pay a 20-shilling fee.<ref>Dewey, 4.</ref> While Wythe qualified and practiced in several county courts, the records available for those cases are sparse. The cases listed below rely primarily on the information printed in Orange County's order books,<ref>Order Book No. 5, 1747-1754, Orange County Records. Reprinted in ''[[Media:OrangeCountyOrderBook1747-1748.pdf|Virginia County Court Records Order Book, Orange County, Virginia, 1747-1748]]'' and ''[[Media:OrangeCountyOrderBook1748-1749.pdf|Virginia County Court Records Order Book, Orange County, Virginia, 1748-1749]],'' edited by Sam and Ruth Sparacio (McLean, VA: Antient Press, 1997).</ref> WOrange County being one of the few locales that identify attorneys in its reports.<ref>Hemphill, 46-47. There is also evidence that indicates Wythe pleaded more cases in Orange County than any other advocate except Zachary Lewis. Hemphill, 48.</ref> Cases in the list that come from a source other than Orange County are marked with a +. |
− | The Wythepedia articles on the county cases briefly summarize | + | The Wythepedia articles on the county cases briefly summarize each case and reproduce the filed complaint when available. |
<div style="column-count:5;-moz-column-count:5;-webkit-column-count:5"> | <div style="column-count:5;-moz-column-count:5;-webkit-column-count:5"> | ||
− | *''[[Complaint, 12 May 1747, of Hart v. Zimmerman|Hart v. Zimmerman]] | + | *''[[Barclay v. Choice]]'' |
− | *''[[Complaint, Lewis v. Chew, February 1748|Lewis v. Chew]]'' | + | *''[[Beazley v. Bramham]]'' |
− | *''[[Complaint, Moore v. Downs, March 1748|Moore v. Downs]]'' | + | *''[[Bell v. Jackson]]'' |
− | *''[[Mullins v. Pendleton]]'' | + | *''[[Bell v. Winslow]]'' |
− | *''[[Complaint, 5 November 1746, of William Russell v. Thomas Dowde|Russell v. Dowde]] | + | *''[[Brown v. Spencer]]'' |
− | *''[[Complaint, 30 March 1747, of Strother v. Zimmerman|Strother v. Zimmerman]] | + | *''[[Coburn v. Long]]'' |
+ | *''[[Field v. Russell]]'' | ||
+ | *''[[Fugitt v. Bramham]]'' | ||
+ | *''[[Gordon v. Kavanaugh]]'' | ||
+ | *''[[Hardin v. Whatley]]'' | ||
+ | *''[[Harrison v. Jones]]'' | ||
+ | *''[[Hart v. Zimmerman and Newport]]'' | ||
+ | *''[[Complaint, 12 May 1747, of Hart v. Zimmerman|Hart v. Zimmerman]]'' + | ||
+ | *''[[Hensley v. Philips]]'' | ||
+ | *''[[Hughes v. Sanders]]'' | ||
+ | *''[[Hunter v. Cook]]'' | ||
+ | *''[[Jackson v. Pickett]]'' | ||
+ | *''[[Kelly v. Eastham]]'' | ||
+ | *''[[The King v. Fox]]'' | ||
+ | *''[[The King v. Ingram]]'' | ||
+ | *''[[Complaint, Lewis v. Chew, February 1748|Lewis v. Chew]]'' + | ||
+ | *''[[Lewis, Whiting, and Washington v. Freeman]]'' | ||
+ | *''[[Madison v. Phillips]]'' | ||
+ | *''[[Moor, Aylett, and Power v. Downs]]'' | ||
+ | *''[[Complaint, Moore v. Downs, March 1748|Moore v. Downs]]'' + | ||
+ | *''[[Morgan v. Lightfoot]]'' | ||
+ | *''[[Moyer v. Hansbarger]]'' | ||
+ | *''[[Mullins v. Pendleton]]'' + | ||
+ | *''[[Picket v. Ware]]'' | ||
+ | *''[[Pickett v. Coleman]]'' | ||
+ | *''[[Price v. Leonard]]'' | ||
+ | *''[[Complaint, 5 November 1746, of William Russell v. Thomas Dowde|Russell v. Dowde]]'' | ||
+ | *''[[Russell v. Wharton]]'' | ||
+ | *''[[Russell v. Zimmerman]]'' | ||
+ | *''[[Scott v. Mauldin and Rucker]]'' | ||
+ | *''[[Shedden v. Morgan]]'' | ||
+ | *''[[Spencer v. Chew]]'' | ||
+ | *''[[Spencer v. Cook]]'' | ||
+ | *''[[Spencer v. Griffin]]'' | ||
+ | *''[[Spencer v. Jones]]'' | ||
+ | *''[[Spencer v. Willis]]'' | ||
+ | *''[[Spotswood v. Christopher]]'' | ||
+ | *''[[Strother v. Whatley]]'' | ||
+ | *''[[Complaint, 30 March 1747, of Strother v. Zimmerman|Strother v. Zimmerman]]'' + | ||
+ | *''[[White v. Stubblefield]]'' | ||
+ | *''[[Williams v. Smith]]'' | ||
+ | *''[[Winslow v. Chew]]'' | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
==General Court cases== | ==General Court cases== | ||
− | Unlike the county courts, the General Court was in one location | + | Unlike the county courts, the General Court was in one location—Williamsburg. The General Court sessions lasted for four weeks and included original cases as well as appellate cases from county courts. Admission to this court was not set by statute, but existing members had to license future members.<ref>Dewey, 2-4.</ref> Official reports of General Court cases disappeared, but we do have records from notes taken by lawyers who practiced before the court.<ref>Kirtland, 96; Hemphill, 130.</ref> For information on cases argued by George Wythe, we are in great debt to the writings of Thomas Jefferson. |
− | Most notably, Jefferson published ''Report of Cases Determined in the General Court of Virginia: From 1730, to 1740; and From 1768, to 1772'' | + | Most notably, in 1829 Jefferson published ''Report of Cases Determined in the General Court of Virginia: From 1730, to 1740; and From 1768, to 1772'' which contained 42 cases decided in the General Court.<ref>Thomas Jefferson, ''Report of Cases Determined in the General Court of Virginia: From 1730, to 1740; and From 1768, to 1772'' (Charlottesville: F. Carr, and Co., 1829), (Buffalo, New York: William S. Hein & Co., Inc., 1981 ed.).</ref> For the early years, Jefferson compiled the manuscript notes written by Sir John Randolph, Edward Barradall, and William Hopkins, and for the later years, Jefferson reported on cases himself.<ref>''Jefferson Reports'', Introduction to the 1981 edition.</ref> Eight of the cases listed below come from those reports.<ref>The cases reported by Jefferson are: ''Blackwell v. Wilkinson, Bolling v. Bolling, Bradford v. Bradford, Brent v. Porter, Carter v. Webb, Godwin v. Lunan, Herndon v. Carr,'' and ''Howell v Netherland.'' Jefferson, ''Report of Cases Determined in the General Court of Virginia.''</ref> Additionally, Jefferson kept a written record of both these cases and one additional Wythe case in his ''Household Accounts and Notes of Virginia Court Legal Cases''.<ref>''Household Accounts and Notes of Virginia Court Legal Cases''. Thomas Jefferson Papers, 1606 to 1827, Series 7: Miscellaneous Bound Volumes, Library of Congress.</ref> The Wythepedia articles on these cases include an introduction and summary of the case as well as any known additional information about case arguments and outcomes. |
− | Most of the rest of the cases listed below come from another Jefferson source, ''Jefferson's Memorandum Books: Accounts, with Legal Records and Miscellany, 1767 | + | Most of the rest of the cases listed below come from another Jefferson source, ''Jefferson's Memorandum Books: Accounts, with Legal Records and Miscellany, 1767—1826''. Jefferson was a meticulous note taker and kept notes on cases that he worked with Wythe,<ref>''Thomas Jefferson's Memorandum Books, Volumes I-II: Accounts, with Legal Records and Miscellany, 1767—1826''. The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, 2nd Series, James A. Bear, Jr. and Lucia C. Stanton, eds. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997).</ref> however, the Wythepedia articles on the cases gleaned from the ''Memorandum Books'' include little information. Jefferson used his memorandum books as working to-do lists, and while they give case names, attorneys, and sometimes details, the books do not provide any information on the outcome or strategy of the cases. |
− | Lastly, there are some records that survive from Wythe's law firm with Robert Carter Nicholas.<ref>Thomas Jefferson and Jefferson-Randolph Family Papers, 1747-1827, in the Tracy W. McGregor Library, Accession #564, 6746, Albert H. and Shirley Small Special Collections Library (Charlottesville, Va: University of Virginia).</ref> We rely on these records for two cases, ''Carrol v. Clifton'' and ''Clifton v. Digges''. | + | Lastly, there are some records that survive from Wythe's law firm with Robert Carter Nicholas.<ref>Thomas Jefferson and Jefferson-Randolph Family Papers, 1747-1827, in the Tracy W. McGregor Library, Accession #564, 6746, Albert H. and Shirley Small Special Collections Library (Charlottesville, Va: University of Virginia).</ref> We rely on these records for two cases, ''[[Carrol v. Clifton]]'' and ''[[Clifton v. Digges]]''. |
Line 103: | Line 145: | ||
*''[[James Hunter v. Glassell]] | *''[[James Hunter v. Glassell]] | ||
*''[[Jefferson v. Stith]]'' | *''[[Jefferson v. Stith]]'' | ||
− | *''[[Jefferson v. | + | *''[[Jefferson v. Fleming's exrs.]]'' |
*''[[Jefferson v. Skipwith]]'' | *''[[Jefferson v. Skipwith]]'' | ||
*''[[Jennings v. Black]]'' | *''[[Jennings v. Black]]'' | ||
− | *''[[Mercer v. | + | *''[[Mercer v. Wayles's exrs.]]'' |
*''[[Mills v. Hayes]]'' | *''[[Mills v. Hayes]]'' | ||
*''[[Philips v. Hubbard]]'' | *''[[Philips v. Hubbard]]'' |
Latest revision as of 12:14, 25 October 2024
George Wythe may be best known as a signer of the Declaration of Independence, a judge on the High Court of Chancery, and for training some of the most influential legal minds of the 18th century at William & Mary, but before doing any of those things, Wythe had spent decades as a successful lawyer. Like most of what we know about Wythe's life, what we know about his legal career does not come from Wythe himself. Instead, we must rely on contemporaneous letters and newspapers as well as what cases we can find in county court records and Thomas Jefferson's case notes.[1] From these sources, however, we can sketch the contours of a successful legal career that extended over 30 years.
At the time Wythe entered the profession, legal training varied and was not as regimented as it is today. Often men who wanted to become lawyers apprenticed with a practicing attorney.[2] George Wythe's education was typical of the times. His first teacher was likely his mother, who taught him reading, writing, and arithmetic. There is conjecture that he attended William & Mary for some formal education between 1730 and 1735,[3] but he would not have studied law there..[4] He began his formal training by apprenticinging under his uncle, Stephen Dewey — the husband of his mother's sister — in Prince George County.[5] Dewey was a justice of the peace and served as member of the House of Burgesses.[6]
When reflecting on this experience later in life, Wythe suggested that this apprenticeship was more about clerk work and printing duties than it was about actually learning the practice of law.[7] This leads some scholars to suggest that the experience informed Wythe's commitment to training prospective attorneys differently later in his life, both when he had apprentices and when he became the nation's first law professor.[8] Although we do not know details of Wythe's day to day routine while apprenticing under his uncle, we can assume that he would have had access to his uncle's legal library.[9][10]
Contents
Early legal career (1746 – 1754)
It is not until 1745 that a law appears in colonial Virginia regarding requirements for admission to the legal bar.[11] Wythe became licensed under these requirements and admitted to the bar in 1746. A copy of Wythe's law license exists in the order books of Augusta County records and his license was signed by Peyton Randolph, St. Lawrence Burford, Stephen Dewey, and William Nimmo.[12] Once licensed, attorneys could practice in county courts but had to be admitted to each court they wished to practice in. Several county courts admitted Wythe in 1746 and 1747, including Elizabeth City and Spotsylvania.[13]
A new member of the bar and in his early 20s, Wythe moved to western Virginia, specifically to Spotsylvania County. Very quickly, Caroline, Orange, and Augusta counties admitted him to practice.[14] Most county court attorneys "rode the circuits" in various counties so it is likely that Wythe qualified in other counties in the area as well, such as Albemarle and Louisa, but there are no official records documenting his work in these or other counties.[15] During his years as an attorney in western Virginia, Wythe befriended and worked alongside Zachary Lewis of Spotsylvania, which aided his success as a young lawyer.[16] Wythe's case load would have covered a wide range of issues, including criminal, civil, and chancery cases, and work on the western circuits would have encompassed the vast territory that was western Virginia at the time (including what is today West Virginia, Kentucky, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, and Wisconsin).[17]
Wythe remained a county court attorney in western Virginia until 1748 when he moved back to Williamsburg or the Elizabeth County area.[18] Upon returning to the capital area, Wythe began his parallel career as a politician when the House of Burgesses selected him to serve as clerk to two standing committees.[19] He stayed in this role until the governor, in January 1754, appointed him interim Attorney General for Virginia while the current Attorney General, Peyton Randolph, was in England advocating for the Colony to the Crown. Wythe served as Attorney General through December 1754.[20]
It is assumed that Wythe continued to ride the circuits of nearby counties such as James City, York, New Kent, and Charles City during this time, though we cannot be sure because court records for these counties have been lost.[21] There is evidence, however, of Wythe arguing at least three cases in Warwick County in 1749, so we know he was still practicing as a county court attorney in this period.[22] There are also records showing he had clients including John Blair in 1751 and the Custis family in 1754.[23] Wythe was appointed to the Williamsburg seat in the House of Burgesses in 1754 and provided counsel for candidates in the House of Burgesses that had legal issues within the House.[24]
For the rest of his legal career, Wythe would balance the practice of law with his service in the colonial government.
Pre-Revolutionary attorney (1754 – 1778)
Sometime between 1754 and 1755, the General Court admitted George Wythe to practice, ending his service on the county court circuit.[25] Between 1755 and 1761, a lawyer could not practice in both county courts and the General Court unless he was a barrister (a person qualified to practice in an English Court). George Wythe chose to practice in the General Court.[26]
Unlike the county courts, the General Court was a superior court located exclusively in Williamsburg.[27] The General Court handled appellate cases that rose out of county court decisions as well as original cases.[28] Very few attorneys served on this court and Wythe practiced alongside some of the top attorneys in Virginia including Peyton Randolph, Robert Carter Nicholas, and Edmund Pendleton.[29] One reason scholars have considered General Court attorneys the best of the best is because three attorneys from the court — Wythe, Pendleton, and Nicholas — were immediately elected to high judgeships after the Revolution.[30] Wythe served on the General Court until start of the Revolution.[31]
As he did through most of his life, Wythe kept additional responsibilities while simultaneously licensed in the General Court. He served as the Elizabeth City County Justice of the Peace in Chesterfield from 1755 until sometime in the 1760s.[32] Likewise, beginning in 1758, Wythe served on the examination board for the General Court and signed licenses for practitioners such as Patrick Henry.[33] Wythe continued serving on this examination board until 1772.[34] Wythe's political career also accelerated during this period as he served as Interim Attorney General (January 1754—December 1754),[35] William & Mary appointed Burgess (1758—1761),[36] Elizabeth County Burgess Representative (1761—1767),[37] appointed Clerk of the House (1768—1774), Mayor of Williamsburg (1770—1771),[38] and Williamsburg Alderman (? —1772).[39]
Although Wythe was never only practicing law, the legal practice he shared with Robert Carter Nicholas flourished in the 1750s and 1760s.[40] Business records from Elizabeth County suggest that he was financially successful because he could afford to expand his property ownership.[41] He served as attorney for George Washington twice during this period and again much later in 1773.[42] Even when he was appointed the Clerk of the House in 1768, a time-consuming job, Wythe continued to keep up his practice before the General Court.[43] It was also in the 1760s that Wythe apprenticed his most famous future lawyer, Thomas Jefferson,[44] who studied under Wythe from 1762 to 1767.[45]
Once the General Court licensed Jefferson, he joined Wythe in legal practice, and they worked together until the outbreak of the Revolution in 1775.[46] Unfortunately, the General Court records have disappeared, but Jefferson was a meticulous note taker, unlike his mentor, and thus, most of the records we have on the cases Wythe executed come from Jefferson's reports during their practice together (1768—1775).[47] Even though we know Wythe was on the court from 1755 to 1765, there is very little record of what cases he was a part of during this early period[48] except some petitions in General Court bearing Wythe's signature or including him as the attorney of record.[49]
Overall, Wythe's pre-revolutionary career was successful, and he managed to balance both the law and politics until 1775, when all normal legal and political activity ceased due to the Revolution.[50] The General Court had its last session in 1775.[51] Wythe did not know it then, but this would mark the end of his legal career as a practitioner. He would return to court as one of the first to be appointed to a high judgeship in 1778.[52]
Wythe's Legal Reputation
Outside of the specifics of his practice, what do we know about Wythe's reputation as a lawyer? While most of the evidence is either anecdotal from those who were close to him like Jefferson, or written after his death, it seems that overall Wythe was known and respected as a lawyer of skill and integrity.
Wythe's presence on the General Court sets him apart as one of the most capable attorneys of the period.[53] It was often said that Wythe had few equals in the courtroom, outside of Edmund Pendleton whom he repeatedly faced in court and who managed to defeat Wythe often.[54] Both lawyers were well respected and continued to compete for over two decades in the General Court.[55] While Wythe was thought to be smarter, Pendleton had a stronger ability to bring forth clever arguments quickly.[56] But this does not mean that Wythe was less skilled than Pendleton. His knowledge of the law was unmatched — "profound" — as noted in an anonymous letter to a local newspaper after his death.[57]
Upon his death, many of his contemporaries cited Wythe's integrity as the key to his legal practice. One contemporary, Reverend Lee Hassey, stated that Wythe "was the only honest lawyer he ever knew."[58] Jefferson declared that Wythe was "as distinguished by correctness and purity of conduct in his profession, as he was by his industry & fidelity to those who employed him."[59] It was also said that the temptations of law never succeeded to corrupt Wythe's purity.[60]
For example, when accepting cases, Wythe was very intentional about who he would and would not represent, never accepting a case simply for financial or reputational gains.[61] As an intake procedure, Wythe required all of his clients to sign affidavits of truth of their testimony and if he later found out they had lied, he would return any money paid and refer them to another attorney.[62]
In a printed eulogy upon Wythe's death, Mason L. Weems told the story of Wythe withdrawing from a client who he believed to be in the wrong and returning his money because Wythe in good conscience could not go on with the suit. The story alleges that Wythe still maintained lawyer-client confidentiality by telling the client "that as conscience will not allow me to say anything for you, honor forbids that I should say anything against you."[63] Meaning that while Wythe could not move forward in the case and advised the client not to either, he would not stand in the way of the client finding another attorney. There is no written evidence for this exchange, but as an anecdotal story, it seems to comply with other observations of Wythe's career from his contemporaries.[64]
Along with his conscientious selection of cases, contemporaries also remembered Wythe to be less concerned about financial success than other attorneys of his day.[65] After his death, public reflections about him as a lawyer stated that he would always take the lowest possible fee, and that no persuasion or subterfuge "could induce him to accept a fee beyond the lowest possible value of his labour."[66]
Admittedly, these assessments of character come after Wythe's death and thus, could be tainted by the desire to remember Wythe in the best light. The consistency of the comments, however, suggest some truth and at the very least Wythe was considered by those who knew him well to be a knowledgeable and skillful lawyer unmatched in his legal integrity.
County Court cases
Most attorneys in colonial Virginia practiced in several county courts, commonly referred to as "riding the circuit."[67] Qualifications for practicing were set by statute. General Court lawyers examined incoming practitioners and certified their good character for each specific county court in which they wanted to practice. Applicants also had to pay a 20-shilling fee.[68] While Wythe qualified and practiced in several county courts, the records available for those cases are sparse. The cases listed below rely primarily on the information printed in Orange County's order books,[69] WOrange County being one of the few locales that identify attorneys in its reports.[70] Cases in the list that come from a source other than Orange County are marked with a +.
The Wythepedia articles on the county cases briefly summarize each case and reproduce the filed complaint when available.
- Barclay v. Choice
- Beazley v. Bramham
- Bell v. Jackson
- Bell v. Winslow
- Brown v. Spencer
- Coburn v. Long
- Field v. Russell
- Fugitt v. Bramham
- Gordon v. Kavanaugh
- Hardin v. Whatley
- Harrison v. Jones
- Hart v. Zimmerman and Newport
- Hart v. Zimmerman +
- Hensley v. Philips
- Hughes v. Sanders
- Hunter v. Cook
- Jackson v. Pickett
- Kelly v. Eastham
- The King v. Fox
- The King v. Ingram
- Lewis v. Chew +
- Lewis, Whiting, and Washington v. Freeman
- Madison v. Phillips
- Moor, Aylett, and Power v. Downs
- Moore v. Downs +
- Morgan v. Lightfoot
- Moyer v. Hansbarger
- Mullins v. Pendleton +
- Picket v. Ware
- Pickett v. Coleman
- Price v. Leonard
- Russell v. Dowde
- Russell v. Wharton
- Russell v. Zimmerman
- Scott v. Mauldin and Rucker
- Shedden v. Morgan
- Spencer v. Chew
- Spencer v. Cook
- Spencer v. Griffin
- Spencer v. Jones
- Spencer v. Willis
- Spotswood v. Christopher
- Strother v. Whatley
- Strother v. Zimmerman +
- White v. Stubblefield
- Williams v. Smith
- Winslow v. Chew
General Court cases
Unlike the county courts, the General Court was in one location—Williamsburg. The General Court sessions lasted for four weeks and included original cases as well as appellate cases from county courts. Admission to this court was not set by statute, but existing members had to license future members.[71] Official reports of General Court cases disappeared, but we do have records from notes taken by lawyers who practiced before the court.[72] For information on cases argued by George Wythe, we are in great debt to the writings of Thomas Jefferson.
Most notably, in 1829 Jefferson published Report of Cases Determined in the General Court of Virginia: From 1730, to 1740; and From 1768, to 1772 which contained 42 cases decided in the General Court.[73] For the early years, Jefferson compiled the manuscript notes written by Sir John Randolph, Edward Barradall, and William Hopkins, and for the later years, Jefferson reported on cases himself.[74] Eight of the cases listed below come from those reports.[75] Additionally, Jefferson kept a written record of both these cases and one additional Wythe case in his Household Accounts and Notes of Virginia Court Legal Cases.[76] The Wythepedia articles on these cases include an introduction and summary of the case as well as any known additional information about case arguments and outcomes.
Most of the rest of the cases listed below come from another Jefferson source, Jefferson's Memorandum Books: Accounts, with Legal Records and Miscellany, 1767—1826. Jefferson was a meticulous note taker and kept notes on cases that he worked with Wythe,[77] however, the Wythepedia articles on the cases gleaned from the Memorandum Books include little information. Jefferson used his memorandum books as working to-do lists, and while they give case names, attorneys, and sometimes details, the books do not provide any information on the outcome or strategy of the cases.
Lastly, there are some records that survive from Wythe's law firm with Robert Carter Nicholas.[78] We rely on these records for two cases, Carrol v. Clifton and Clifton v. Digges.
- Allen v. Allen
- Anderson v. Anderson
- Archer v. Crawford
- Bland v. Rose
- Beckham v. Philips
- Blackwell v. Wilkinson
- Bolling v. Bolling
- Bradford v. Bradford
- Brent v. Porter
- Brown v. Maupin
- Carrol v. Clifton
- Carter v. Webb
- Cary v. The King
- Clifton v. Diggs*
- Cloyd v. Cloyd
- Cole v. Leigh
- Cole v. Robertson*
- Custis v. West
- Dalton v. Lyons
- Godwin v. Lunan
- Hardaway v. Bland
- Harris v. Jefferson
- Herndon v. Carr
- Hite v. Fairfax
- Hooker v. Burwell
- Howell v. Netherland
- Hudson v. Hudson
- Adam Hunter v. Glassell
- James Hunter v. Glassell
- Jefferson v. Stith
- Jefferson v. Fleming's exrs.
- Jefferson v. Skipwith
- Jennings v. Black
- Mercer v. Wayles's exrs.
- Mills v. Hayes
- Philips v. Hubbard
- Quarles v. Gregory
- Speirs v. Thomas
- Stephens v. Cabage
- Thornton v. Hunter
- Turnstall v. Hunt
- Turpin v. Goode
See also
References
- ↑ Source material on George Wythe's early career is scant, at best. See Kirtland, George Wythe: Lawyer, Revolutionary, Judge (New York: Garland, 1986).
- ↑ Frank L. Dewey, Thomas Jefferson Lawyer (Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press, 1987), 3.
- ↑ William Edwin Hemphill, "George Wythe the Colonial Briton: A Biographical Study of Pre-Revolutionary Era in Virginia," 34 (citing the History of the College of William and Mary from its Foundation, 1660 to 1874, 84).
- ↑ Kirtland, 36-37.
- ↑ Kirtland, 40; see also Dewey, 3.
- ↑ See Hemphill, 36. Both positions Wythe would later also hold.
- ↑ Hemphill, 37; Kirtland, 40-41.
- ↑ Hemphill, 38.
- ↑ Hemphill, 38.
- ↑ Kirtland, 40-41.
- ↑ Hemphill, 41 (citing Henning Statutes).
- ↑ Hemphill, 42 (citing entry of May 21, 1747, Order Book No. 1, 196, Augusta County Records.
- ↑ Hemphill, 42. For record of Elizabeth County admission see June 18, 1746, minutes in Order Book, 1731-1747, 489, Elizabeth County Records. For Spotsylvania County admission, see November 4, 1746, Orders, 1738-1749, 395, Spotsylvania County Records; see also Kirtland, 42.
- ↑ Hemphill, 43-46 (qualified in Carolina County in February of 1747 and Augusta/Staunton in May of 1747); see also Kirtland, 42.
- ↑ Hemphill, 45.
- ↑ Zachary Lewis also becomes Wythe's father-in-law. Horace Edwin Hayden, Virginia Genealogies (Wilkes-Barre, PA: E.B. Yordy, 1891), 381-382.
- ↑ Hemphill, 48-49.
- ↑ There is some speculation that Wythe moves back home because of the death of his first wife, Ann Lewis. Hemphill, 52.
- ↑ Hemphill, 55.
- ↑ Hemphill, 66-71.
- ↑ Hemphill, 55.
- ↑ Hemphill, 55 (citing entries of April 6, 1749, Minutes, 1748-1762, 29-31, Warwick County Records).
- ↑ Hemphill, 56-57. For John Blair see entries of March 20, 22, October 2, November 7, 1751, William and Mary College Quarterly 1st Series, VII, 137, VIII, 5, VII, 146, 148; for Custis family see letter from Wythe to Daniel Parke Custis, April 10, 1754).
- ↑ Hemphill, 57.
- ↑ The exact date of his appointment is unclear, but Hemphill argues that it was likely sometime before May 1755 because there is a license signed by Wythe for Paul Carrington in 1755, which would have required that Wythe have a license in the General Court. See Hemphill, 77 (citing 1755 license for Paul Carrington).
- ↑ Kirtland, 45; Dewey, 2,4.
- ↑ Dewey, 3.
- ↑ Kirtland, 45.
- ↑ Hemphill, 84.
- ↑ Dewey, 7.
- ↑ Kirtland, 45.
- ↑ Hemphill, 75 (citing Order Book, 1775—1776, Elizabeth City County Records).
- ↑ Hemphill, 106 (citing Tyler's Quarterly Magazine, IX, 97). Also signed the licenses of Peter Hog. Hemphill, 106 (citing Brock, ed., Records of Dinwiddie, I, 470, n.); Dewey, 118.
- ↑ Hemphill, 105; Dewey, 118.
- ↑ Kirtland, 46.
- ↑ Hemphill, 166-167.
- ↑ Hemphill, 170.
- ↑ Hemphill, 258 (citing Virginia Gazette, pub. By Purdie and Dixon, December 3, 1772); Kirtland, 49.
- ↑ Hemphill, 258.
- ↑ Hemphill, 258.
- ↑ Hemphill, 104.
- ↑ Hemphill, 102 (citing Robert Carter Nicholas to George Washington, January 5, 1758, Stanislaus Murray Hamilton, ed., Letters to Washington and Accompanying Papers, II, 256; Entries of April 1 and May 21, 1760, John C. Fitzpatrick ed., The Diaries of George Washington, 1748-1799, I, 147, 163). For later representation see Hemphill, 137 (citing George Wythe to George Washington, December 15, 1773, Hamilton, ed., Letters to Washington, IV, 282-284; George Washington to George Wythe, January 17, 1774, Fitzpatrick, ed., Writings of Washington, III, 174-176; George Washington to John Parke Custis, May 26, 1778, Fitzpatrick, ed., Writings of Washington, XI, 456)
- ↑ Kirtland, 96 (stating that Wythe's duties as clerk "were not so arduous as to preclude Wythe's practice before the General Court").
- ↑ Hemphill, 114. Jefferson was not the only legal student apprenticed by Wythe at this time. There were others including St. George Tucker. See Hemphill, 146; Kirtland, 97.
- ↑ Hemphill, 124.
- ↑ Hemphill, 124 (citing "Autobiography," Berg. ed., Writings of Jefferson, I, 4). For General court closing see Hemphill, 149.
- ↑ See Thomas Jefferson, Reports of Cases Determined in the General Court of Virginia from 1730 to 1740 and from 1768 to 1772 (Buffalo, NY: William S. Hein & Co., Inc., 1981); see also Hemphill, 130-132; Kirtland, 96.
- ↑ Hemphill, 10
- ↑ See Hemphill, 144 (citing Petition of Achilles Foster, undated, Autograph Collection of the Signers of the Declaration of Independence, Henry E. Huntington Library and Art Gallery; Petition of Solomon Redmon, undated [ca.1772], in the possession of Thomas F. Hadigan Co., New York, December 1936; Petition of John Randolph, February 12, 1773, Gratz Collection, Pennsylvania Historical Society Library).
- ↑ Kirtland, 97-98.
- ↑ Hemphill, 149.
- ↑ Kirtland, 119.
- ↑ Dewey, 7; Kirtland, 49.
- ↑ Kirtland, 49-51, 59; see also Hemphill, 98.
- ↑ Hemphill, 159.
- ↑ Hemphill, 159-161.
- ↑ Hemphill, 150 (citing Anonymous "Communication," The Enquirer, June 10, 1806).
- ↑ Hemphill, 153 (citing J.T. Stoddert, letter to Bishop Heade, reprinted in Heade, op. cit., II, 238).
- ↑ Hemphill, 154 (citing Jefferson, "Notes for the Biography of George Wythe," Jefferson Papers, Library of Congress).
- ↑ Hemphill (citing Randolph, Manuscript History of Virginia, Virginia Historical Magazine, XLIII, 131).
- ↑ Hemphill, 154.
- ↑ Hemphill, 154-155 (citing "Memoirs of the Late George Wythe, Esquire," The American Gleaner and Virginia Gazette, I, 2-3); see also Kirtland, 58.
- ↑ Hemphill, 155-156 (citing a reprint from The Charleston, S.C., Times, July 1, 1806, in William and Mary College Quarterly, 1st Series, XXV, 18-19.
- ↑ Hemphill, 157.
- ↑ Hemphill, 157.
- ↑ Hemphill, 157, (citing "Communication" signed "A.B." Virginia Gazette, and General Advertiser, June 18, 1806).
- ↑ Dewey, 1.
- ↑ Dewey, 4.
- ↑ Order Book No. 5, 1747-1754, Orange County Records. Reprinted in Virginia County Court Records Order Book, Orange County, Virginia, 1747-1748 and Virginia County Court Records Order Book, Orange County, Virginia, 1748-1749, edited by Sam and Ruth Sparacio (McLean, VA: Antient Press, 1997).
- ↑ Hemphill, 46-47. There is also evidence that indicates Wythe pleaded more cases in Orange County than any other advocate except Zachary Lewis. Hemphill, 48.
- ↑ Dewey, 2-4.
- ↑ Kirtland, 96; Hemphill, 130.
- ↑ Thomas Jefferson, Report of Cases Determined in the General Court of Virginia: From 1730, to 1740; and From 1768, to 1772 (Charlottesville: F. Carr, and Co., 1829), (Buffalo, New York: William S. Hein & Co., Inc., 1981 ed.).
- ↑ Jefferson Reports, Introduction to the 1981 edition.
- ↑ The cases reported by Jefferson are: Blackwell v. Wilkinson, Bolling v. Bolling, Bradford v. Bradford, Brent v. Porter, Carter v. Webb, Godwin v. Lunan, Herndon v. Carr, and Howell v Netherland. Jefferson, Report of Cases Determined in the General Court of Virginia.
- ↑ Household Accounts and Notes of Virginia Court Legal Cases. Thomas Jefferson Papers, 1606 to 1827, Series 7: Miscellaneous Bound Volumes, Library of Congress.
- ↑ Thomas Jefferson's Memorandum Books, Volumes I-II: Accounts, with Legal Records and Miscellany, 1767—1826. The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, 2nd Series, James A. Bear, Jr. and Lucia C. Stanton, eds. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997).
- ↑ Thomas Jefferson and Jefferson-Randolph Family Papers, 1747-1827, in the Tracy W. McGregor Library, Accession #564, 6746, Albert H. and Shirley Small Special Collections Library (Charlottesville, Va: University of Virginia).
External links
- "County Formation during the Colonial Period," Encyclopedia Virginia.