Complaint, 5 November 1746, of William Russell v. Thomas Dowde

From Wythepedia: The George Wythe Encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Complaint, 5 November 1746, of William Russell v. Thomas Dowde, in Orange County, Virginia Court. Special Collections, Wolf Law Library, College of William & Mary.

The young attorney, George Wythe was only twenty years old when he filed this complaint to the Orange County, Virginia Court in 1746. Wythe represented Mr. William Russell, plaintiff, against Thomas Dowde. The suit is an action for damages caused by the defendant’s alleged theft of Russell’s hog. Wythe cites an Act of Assembly which provides that hog-thieves are to pay £10 and 400 pounds of tobacco for damages in such suits. In this case, the defendant had already been ordered by the court to pay the statutorily required damages. Dowde paid the 400 pounds of tobacco to Russell, but refuses to pay the £10. Wythe alleges that Mr. Dowde had not even paid 40 shillings (or £2). This pleading serves as a new action against Mr. Dowde for failure to pay court ordered damages.

Manuscript text

Orange County, to wit, William Russell Gent. complains of Thomas Dowde of a Plea of Debt that he render to him ten pounds Current Money of Virginia, which he owes to and unjustly detains from him for that whereas the said Thomas on the fifth Day of November the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and forty six at the County aforesaid did feloniously steal take and carry away one hog, the Property of a certain Person unknown by which and by Force of the Act of Assembly made and provided in such Cases an Action accrued to the said William to demand and receive of the said Thomas the said Sum of ten Pounds and also four hundred Pounds of Tobacco which said four hundred Pounds of Tobacco the said William doth hereby acknowledge to have received Nevertheless the said Thomas although he hath been often thereunto required hath not yet paid or satisfied so the said William the aforesaid ten Pounds but hath hitherto altogether refused and still doth refuse to pay the same to him to the Damage of the said William forty shillings and therefore he hath brought this Suit, and so forth.

Wythe for the Plaintiff for the Defense

Reverse

Detail of reverse of Complaint, Russell v. Dowde.

Russell
v.          } Narr,
Dowde
June C.O.vDef.t
Aug. Owe Nothing
by F.J.
Oct.r Cont.
Feb.y 1747 Verd.t for Def.t

we of the Jury find
for the Defendant
F.Jameson Formn