Difference between revisions of "Jones v. Tomlinson"
From Wythepedia: The George Wythe Encyclopedia
m |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Jones v. Tomlinson''}} | {{DISPLAYTITLE:''Jones v. Tomlinson''}} | ||
| − | [[File: | + | [[File:WashingtonJonesvTomlinson1798v1p230.jpg|link={{filepath:WashingtonsReports1798V1JonesvTomlinson.pdf}}|thumb|right|300px|First page of the opinion [[Media:WashingtonsReports1798V1JonesvTomlinson.pdf|''Jones v. Tomlinson'']], in [http://wm-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/01COWM_WM:EVERYTHING:01COWM_WM_ALMA21560662660003196 ''Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Court of Appeals of Virginia''], by Bushrod Washington. Richmond: T. Nicolson, 1798.]] |
[[Media:WashingtonsReports1798V1JonesvTomlinson.pdf|''Jones v. Tomlinson'']], 1 Va. (1 Wash.) 230 (1793),<ref>Bushrod Washington, ''Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Court of Appeals of Virginia'', (Richmond: T. Nicolson, 1798), 1:230.</ref> is a case where the Court determined who had property rights in a land dispute. | [[Media:WashingtonsReports1798V1JonesvTomlinson.pdf|''Jones v. Tomlinson'']], 1 Va. (1 Wash.) 230 (1793),<ref>Bushrod Washington, ''Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Court of Appeals of Virginia'', (Richmond: T. Nicolson, 1798), 1:230.</ref> is a case where the Court determined who had property rights in a land dispute. | ||
==Background== | ==Background== | ||
Williams and Tomlinson obtained the right to live on a tract of land before 1775. Jacobs and his wife obtained the same land from David Rodgers through a military warrant in 1784. Williams and Tomlinson sued John J. Jacobs and his wife in the High Court of Chancery to solidify their property rights. In their answer, Jacobs and his wife insisted Rodgers had the right to settle prior to the plaintiffs. They also disclosed that based on this premise, they sold the land to Jones, making him a defendant in the case. | Williams and Tomlinson obtained the right to live on a tract of land before 1775. Jacobs and his wife obtained the same land from David Rodgers through a military warrant in 1784. Williams and Tomlinson sued John J. Jacobs and his wife in the High Court of Chancery to solidify their property rights. In their answer, Jacobs and his wife insisted Rodgers had the right to settle prior to the plaintiffs. They also disclosed that based on this premise, they sold the land to Jones, making him a defendant in the case. | ||
| + | |||
===The Court's Decision=== | ===The Court's Decision=== | ||
| − | After hearing depositions proving that Williams and Tomlinson settled first, Chancellor Wythe decreed in favor of the plaintiffs. The Court of Appeals, swayed by the argument that the land could not be possessed under the King’s crown [British rule], reversed Wythe’s decision with court costs. | + | After hearing depositions proving that Williams and Tomlinson settled first, [[George Wythe|Chancellor Wythe]] decreed in favor of the plaintiffs. The Court of Appeals, swayed by the argument that the land could not be possessed under the King’s crown [British rule], reversed Wythe’s decision with court costs. |
| + | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
*[[Wythe's Judicial Career]] | *[[Wythe's Judicial Career]] | ||
| Line 15: | Line 17: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
[[Category: Cases]] | [[Category: Cases]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Real Property]] | ||
Latest revision as of 14:34, 5 September 2018
First page of the opinion Jones v. Tomlinson, in Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Court of Appeals of Virginia, by Bushrod Washington. Richmond: T. Nicolson, 1798.
Jones v. Tomlinson, 1 Va. (1 Wash.) 230 (1793),[1] is a case where the Court determined who had property rights in a land dispute.
Background
Williams and Tomlinson obtained the right to live on a tract of land before 1775. Jacobs and his wife obtained the same land from David Rodgers through a military warrant in 1784. Williams and Tomlinson sued John J. Jacobs and his wife in the High Court of Chancery to solidify their property rights. In their answer, Jacobs and his wife insisted Rodgers had the right to settle prior to the plaintiffs. They also disclosed that based on this premise, they sold the land to Jones, making him a defendant in the case.
The Court's Decision
After hearing depositions proving that Williams and Tomlinson settled first, Chancellor Wythe decreed in favor of the plaintiffs. The Court of Appeals, swayed by the argument that the land could not be possessed under the King’s crown [British rule], reversed Wythe’s decision with court costs.
See also
References
- ↑ Bushrod Washington, Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Court of Appeals of Virginia, (Richmond: T. Nicolson, 1798), 1:230.
