Difference between revisions of "Brown v. Brown"
m (→Background) |
m (→Background) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Background== | ==Background== | ||
| − | Samuel Brown passed away and his administrator, Wentworth, saw to the execution of his estate. Wentworth also owed Brown’s estate about £386. After Mr. Wentworth died, Thomas Brown was appointed the guardian of Samuel Brown’s children and Ms. Wentworth became the administrator of her husband’s estate. After Ms. Wentworth’s death, John Day became the administrator of the estate. However, not long after, a suit was filed to divide the Wentworth estate among his children, one of whom was the wife of Thomas Brown. According to documents, while Ms. Wentworth was alive, John Day paid Thomas Brown the £386 debt on behalf of Wentworth to the Brown orphans. However, Thomas Brown’s ledger showed no instance of payment, yet for a sum of £155, in spite of keeping accurate records of accounts on the same day. The children of Samuel Brown sued the amount | + | Samuel Brown passed away and his administrator, Wentworth, saw to the execution of his estate. Wentworth also owed Brown’s estate about £386. After Mr. Wentworth died, Thomas Brown was appointed the guardian of Samuel Brown’s children and Ms. Wentworth became the administrator of her husband’s estate. After Ms. Wentworth’s death, John Day became the administrator of the estate. However, not long after, a suit was filed to divide the Wentworth estate among his children, one of whom was the wife of Thomas Brown. According to documents, while Ms. Wentworth was alive, John Day paid Thomas Brown the £386 debt on behalf of Wentworth to the Brown orphans. However, Thomas Brown’s ledger showed no instance of payment, yet for a sum of £155, in spite of keeping accurate records of accounts on the same day. The children of Samuel Brown sued for the amount they believed Wentworth owed their estate. |
===The Court's Decision=== | ===The Court's Decision=== | ||
| − | Chancellor Wythe found for Thomas Brown but the Court of Appeals reversed the judgment. | + | Chancellor Wythe found for Thomas Brown, but the Court of Appeals reversed the judgment. |
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Revision as of 11:20, 15 December 2017
File:WashingtonsReports1798V2BrownvBrown.pdf
Brown v. Brown, Washington Vol. II 151 (1795),[1] the court resolved account discrepancies of the estate.
Background
Samuel Brown passed away and his administrator, Wentworth, saw to the execution of his estate. Wentworth also owed Brown’s estate about £386. After Mr. Wentworth died, Thomas Brown was appointed the guardian of Samuel Brown’s children and Ms. Wentworth became the administrator of her husband’s estate. After Ms. Wentworth’s death, John Day became the administrator of the estate. However, not long after, a suit was filed to divide the Wentworth estate among his children, one of whom was the wife of Thomas Brown. According to documents, while Ms. Wentworth was alive, John Day paid Thomas Brown the £386 debt on behalf of Wentworth to the Brown orphans. However, Thomas Brown’s ledger showed no instance of payment, yet for a sum of £155, in spite of keeping accurate records of accounts on the same day. The children of Samuel Brown sued for the amount they believed Wentworth owed their estate.
The Court's Decision
Chancellor Wythe found for Thomas Brown, but the Court of Appeals reversed the judgment.
See also
References
- ↑ Bushrod Washington, Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Court of Appeals of Virginia, (Richmond: T. Nicolson, 1798), 151.
