Difference between revisions of "Applebury v. Anthony"

From Wythepedia: The George Wythe Encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Background)
m
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Applebury v. Anthony''}}
 
{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Applebury v. Anthony''}}
[[File:WashingtonsReports1798V1AppleburyvAnthony.pdf|link=Media:WashingtonsReports1798V1AppleburyvAnthony.pdf|thumb|right|300px|First page of the opinion [[Media:WashingtonsReports1798V1AppleburyvAnthony.pdf|''Applebury v. Anthony'']], in [https://catalog.swem.wm.edu/law/Record/2099031 ''Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Court of Appeals of Virginia''], by Bushrod Washington. 1st ed. Richmond: T. Nicolson, 1798.]]
+
[[File:WashingtonAppleburyVAnthony1798v1p287.jpg|link={{filepath:WashingtonsReports1798V1AppleburyvAnthony.pdf}}|thumb|right|300px|First page of the opinion [[Media:WashingtonsReports1798V1AppleburyvAnthony.pdf|''Applebury v. Anthony'']], in [https://wm.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01COWM_INST/g9pr7p/alma991017790129703196 ''Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Court of Appeals of Virginia''], by Bushrod Washington. 1st ed. Richmond: T. Nicolson, 1798.]]
__NOTOC__
+
[[Media:WashingtonsReports1798V1AppleburyvAnthony.pdf|''Applebury v. Anthony'']], 1 Va. (1 Wash) 287 (1794),<ref>[[Bushrod Washington]], ''[[Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Court of Appeals of Virginia]],'' (Richmond: T. Nicolson, 1798), 1:287.</ref> was a family dispute over the ownership of a slave promised in a marriage contract.
[[Media:WashingtonsReports1798V1AppleburyvAnthony.pdf|''Applebury v. Anthony'']], Washington Vol. I 287 (1794),<ref>Bushrod Washington, ''[[Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Court of Appeals of Virginia]],'' (Richmond: T. Nicolson, 1798), 287.</ref> was a family dispute over the ownership of a slave promised in a marriage contract.
 
  
 
==Background==
 
==Background==
The children of Thomas Applebury sued James Anthony’s (their grandfather's) executors in the Court of Equity to recover a slave named Lucy. Before Thomas Applebury married James Anthony’s daughter, Anthony promised Applebury the slave, Lucy, in the form of a marriage contract. After the marriage took place, Anthony refused to deliver the slave, triggering an arbitration suit between the father and son-in-law. During the arbitration, Anthony proposed to convey the slave to all his daughter’s children, which led Applebury to dismiss the suit. In May 1769, the grandfather kept his word and executed a deed for the slave according to the terms of the compromise. However, the deed was lost or misplaced. After James Anthony’s death in 1784, his executors refused to deliver the slave. The executors claimed that Applebury, the original benefactor, and Anthony exchanged Lucy and her children for another slave and £60 in May 1769, which voided the will.
+
The children of Thomas Applebury sued James Anthony's (their grandfather's) executors in the Court of Equity to recover a slave named Lucy. Before Thomas Applebury married James Anthony's daughter, Anthony promised Applebury the slave, Lucy, in the form of a marriage contract. After the marriage took place, Anthony refused to deliver the slave, triggering an arbitration suit between the father and son-in-law. During the arbitration, Anthony proposed to convey the slave to all his daughter's children, which led Applebury to dismiss the suit. In May 1769, the grandfather kept his word and executed a deed for the slave according to the terms of the compromise. However, the deed was lost or misplaced. After James Anthony’s death in 1784, his executors refused to deliver the slave. The executors claimed that Applebury, the original benefactor, and Anthony exchanged Lucy and her children for another slave and £60 in May 1769, which voided the will.
  
 
===The Court's Decision===
 
===The Court's Decision===
The County Court found in favor of the Applebury children. Chancellor Wythe reversed the lower court’s decree. On appeal, the Appellate court affirmed Chancellor Wythe's decree.
+
The County Court found in favor of the Applebury children. [[George Wythe|Chancellor Wythe]] reversed the lower court's decree. On appeal, the Appellate court affirmed Chancellor Wythe's decree.
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
 +
*[[George Wythe and Slavery]]
 
*[[Wythe's Judicial Career]]
 
*[[Wythe's Judicial Career]]
  
Line 16: Line 16:
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
  
 
+
__NOTOC__
 
 
 
[[Category: Cases]]
 
[[Category: Cases]]
 +
[[Category: Marital Property]]
 +
[[Category: Slavery]]

Latest revision as of 13:30, 29 March 2022

First page of the opinion Applebury v. Anthony, in Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Court of Appeals of Virginia, by Bushrod Washington. 1st ed. Richmond: T. Nicolson, 1798.

Applebury v. Anthony, 1 Va. (1 Wash) 287 (1794),[1] was a family dispute over the ownership of a slave promised in a marriage contract.

Background

The children of Thomas Applebury sued James Anthony's (their grandfather's) executors in the Court of Equity to recover a slave named Lucy. Before Thomas Applebury married James Anthony's daughter, Anthony promised Applebury the slave, Lucy, in the form of a marriage contract. After the marriage took place, Anthony refused to deliver the slave, triggering an arbitration suit between the father and son-in-law. During the arbitration, Anthony proposed to convey the slave to all his daughter's children, which led Applebury to dismiss the suit. In May 1769, the grandfather kept his word and executed a deed for the slave according to the terms of the compromise. However, the deed was lost or misplaced. After James Anthony’s death in 1784, his executors refused to deliver the slave. The executors claimed that Applebury, the original benefactor, and Anthony exchanged Lucy and her children for another slave and £60 in May 1769, which voided the will.

The Court's Decision

The County Court found in favor of the Applebury children. Chancellor Wythe reversed the lower court's decree. On appeal, the Appellate court affirmed Chancellor Wythe's decree.

See also

References

  1. Bushrod Washington, Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Court of Appeals of Virginia, (Richmond: T. Nicolson, 1798), 1:287.