Difference between revisions of "Brown v. Brown"

From Wythepedia: The George Wythe Encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Brown v. Brown''}} File:WashingtonsReports1798V2BrownvBrown.pdf|link=Media:WashingtonsReports1798V2BrownvBrown.pdf|thumb|right|300px|First page of the opini...")
 
m
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Brown v. Brown''}}
 
{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Brown v. Brown''}}
[[File:WashingtonsReports1798V2BrownvBrown.pdf|link=Media:WashingtonsReports1798V2BrownvBrown.pdf|thumb|right|300px|First page of the opinion [[Media:WashingtonsReports1798V2BrownvBrown.pdf|''Brown v. Brown'']], in [https://catalog.swem.wm.edu/law/Record/2099031 ''Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Court of Appeals of Virginia''], by Bushrod Washington. Richmond: T. Nicolson, 1798.]]
+
[[File:WashingtonBrownvBrown1799v2p151.jpg|link={{filepath:WashingtonsReports1798V2BrownvBrown.pdf}}|thumb|right|300px|First page of the opinion [[Media:WashingtonsReports1798V2BrownvBrown.pdf|''Brown v. Brown'']], in [http://wm-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/01COWM_WM:EVERYTHING:01COWM_WM_ALMA21560662660003196 ''Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Court of Appeals of Virginia''], by Bushrod Washington. Richmond: T. Nicolson, 1798.]]
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
[[Media:WashingtonsReports1798V2BrownvBrown.pdf|''Brown v. Brown'']], Washington Vol. II 151 (1795),<ref>Bushrod Washington, ''[[Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Court of Appeals of Virginia]],'' (Richmond: T. Nicolson, 1798), 151.</ref> the court resolved account discrepancies of the estate.  
+
[[Media:WashingtonsReports1798V2BrownvBrown.pdf|''Brown v. Brown'']], 2 Va. (2 Wash.) 151 (1795),<ref>Bushrod Washington, ''[[Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Court of Appeals of Virginia]],'' (Richmond: T. Nicolson, 1798), 2:151.</ref> the court resolved account discrepancies of the estate.  
  
 
==Background==
 
==Background==
This suit was brought by the children of Samuel Brown. Samuel Brown passed away and his administrator Mr. Wentworth saw to the execution of his estate. Wentworth also owed Brown’s estate about 386 pounds. After Mr. Wentworth died, Thomas Brown was appointed the guardian of Samuel Brown’s children and Ms. Wentworth became the administrator of her husband’s estate. After Ms. Wentworth’s death, John Day became the administrator of the estate. However, not long after, a suit was filed to divide the Wentworth estate among his children, one of whom was the wife of Thomas Brown. According to documents, while Ms. Wentworth was alive, John Day paid Thomas Brown the £386 debt on behalf of Wentworth to the Brown orphans. However, Thomas Brown’s ledger showed no instance of payment, yet for a sum of £155. This was in spite of keeping very accurate records of accounts on the same day. Basically, the Brown orphans were suing for their money from their guardian, who was shown to be paid by the Wentworth Estate.
+
Samuel Brown passed away and his administrator, Wentworth, saw to the execution of his estate. Wentworth also owed Brown’s estate about £386. After Wentworth died, Thomas Brown was appointed the guardian of Samuel Brown’s children and Wentworth's widow became the administrator of her husband’s estate. After her death, John Day became the administrator of the estate. However, not long after, a suit was filed to divide the Wentworth estate among his children, one of whom was the wife of Thomas Brown. According to documents, while Wentworth's widow was alive, John Day paid Thomas Brown the £386 debt on behalf of Wentworth to the Brown orphans. However, Thomas Brown’s ledger showed no instance of payment, yet for a sum of £155, in spite of keeping accurate records of accounts on the same day. The children of Samuel Brown sued for the amount they believed Wentworth owed their estate.
 +
 
 
===The Court's Decision===
 
===The Court's Decision===
Chancellor Wythe found for Thomas Brown but the Court of Appeals reversed the judgment.
+
[[George Wythe|Chancellor Wythe]] found for Thomas Brown, but the Court of Appeals reversed the judgment.
 +
 
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
 
*[[Wythe's Judicial Career]]
 
*[[Wythe's Judicial Career]]
Line 13: Line 15:
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
 
 
  
 
[[Category: Cases]]
 
[[Category: Cases]]
 +
[[Category: Inheritance]]

Latest revision as of 13:42, 5 September 2018

First page of the opinion Brown v. Brown, in Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Court of Appeals of Virginia, by Bushrod Washington. Richmond: T. Nicolson, 1798.

Brown v. Brown, 2 Va. (2 Wash.) 151 (1795),[1] the court resolved account discrepancies of the estate.

Background

Samuel Brown passed away and his administrator, Wentworth, saw to the execution of his estate. Wentworth also owed Brown’s estate about £386. After Wentworth died, Thomas Brown was appointed the guardian of Samuel Brown’s children and Wentworth's widow became the administrator of her husband’s estate. After her death, John Day became the administrator of the estate. However, not long after, a suit was filed to divide the Wentworth estate among his children, one of whom was the wife of Thomas Brown. According to documents, while Wentworth's widow was alive, John Day paid Thomas Brown the £386 debt on behalf of Wentworth to the Brown orphans. However, Thomas Brown’s ledger showed no instance of payment, yet for a sum of £155, in spite of keeping accurate records of accounts on the same day. The children of Samuel Brown sued for the amount they believed Wentworth owed their estate.

The Court's Decision

Chancellor Wythe found for Thomas Brown, but the Court of Appeals reversed the judgment.

See also

References

  1. Bushrod Washington, Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Court of Appeals of Virginia, (Richmond: T. Nicolson, 1798), 2:151.