View source for M'Call v. Peachy

{{DISPLAYTITLE:''M'Call v. Peachy''}}
[[File:CallM'CallvPeachy1854v1p55.jpg|link={{filepath:CallsReports1854V1M'CallvPeachy.pdf}}|thumb|right|300px|First page of the opinion [[Media:CallsReports1854V1M'CallvPeachy.pdf|''M'Call v. Peachy'']], in [https://wm.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01COWM_INST/g9pr7p/alma991006014269703196 ''Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Court of Appeals of Virginia''], by Daniel Call. Ed. by Lucian Minor, 3rd ed. Richmond: A. Morris, 1854.]]
In [[Media:CallsReports1854V1M'CallvPeachy.pdf|''M'Call v. Peachy'']], 5 Va. (1 Call) 48 (1798),<ref>Daniel Call, ''Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Court of Appeals in Virginia,'' (Richmond: A. Morris, 1854) 5:48.</ref> the court determined whether the consent of both parties could grant a court jurisdiction over their case.
==Background==
The Court of Appeals sought to answer whether it had jurisdiction over a High Court of Chancery case for an interlocutory decree that was appealed by the consent of both parties rather than permitted to be appealed by Chancellor Wythe.
===The Court's Decision===
The Court Appeals determined that the consent of both parties cannot give jurisdiction. 
==See also==
*[[Wythe's Judicial Career]]

==References==
<references/>

__NOTOC__
[[Category: Cases]]
[[Category: Procedure]]