Difference between revisions of "Hadfield v. Jameson"

From Wythepedia: The George Wythe Encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 2: Line 2:
 
[[File:Munfords_Reports1814V2HadfieldvJameson.jpg|link=Media:Munfords_Reports1814V2HadfieldvJameson.pdf|thumb|right|300px|First page of the opinion [[Media:Munfords_Reports1814V2HadfieldvJameson.pdf|''Hadfield v. Jameson'']], in [http://wm-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/01COWM_WM:EVERYTHING:01COWM_WM_ALMA21560678820003196 ''Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia''], by William Munford. New York: I. Riley, 1814.]]
 
[[File:Munfords_Reports1814V2HadfieldvJameson.jpg|link=Media:Munfords_Reports1814V2HadfieldvJameson.pdf|thumb|right|300px|First page of the opinion [[Media:Munfords_Reports1814V2HadfieldvJameson.pdf|''Hadfield v. Jameson'']], in [http://wm-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/01COWM_WM:EVERYTHING:01COWM_WM_ALMA21560678820003196 ''Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia''], by William Munford. New York: I. Riley, 1814.]]
  
[[Media:Munfords_Reports1814V2HadfieldvJameson.pdf|''Hadfield v. Jameson'']], Munford Vol. II 53 (1809),<ref>William Munford, ''Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia,'' (New York: I. Riley, 1814), 2:53.</ref> was a maritime attachment case.
+
[[Media:Munfords_Reports1814V2HadfieldvJameson.pdf|''Hadfield v. Jameson'']], 16 Va. (2 Munf.) 53 (1809),<ref>William Munford, ''Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia,'' (New York: I. Riley, 1814), 2:53.</ref> was a maritime attachment case.
  
 
==Background==
 
==Background==

Revision as of 11:27, 12 March 2018

Hadfield v. Jameson, 16 Va. (2 Munf.) 53 (1809),[1] was a maritime attachment case.

Background

Robert Brown Jameson & Co. brought a maritime attachment against Joseph Hadfield to garnish payment for the freight and insurance of a ship called Favorite.

The Court's Decision

Chancellor Wythe affirmed the decree of the county court of Fairfax. The Court of Appeals reversed both decrees and dismissed the case in favor of the appellant.

See also

References

  1. William Munford, Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia, (New York: I. Riley, 1814), 2:53.