Cheshire v. Atkinson
From Wythepedia: The George Wythe Encyclopedia
Revision as of 15:00, 13 November 2017 by Drbordley (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Cheshire v. Atkinson''}} File:Hening&MunfordsReports1809V1ChesirevAtkinson.pdf|link=Media:Hening&MunfordsReports1809V1ChesirevAtkinson.pdf|thumb|right|300px...")
File:Hening&MunfordsReports1809V1ChesirevAtkinson.pdf
Cheshire v. Atkinson, Hening & Munford Vol. I 209 (1807),[1] the court determined whether a sheriff could be attached for carrying out a decree from a judge, although the sheriff knew the case was pending appeal.
Background
A very brief case where the court determined that the plaintiff could not bring an attachment against a sheriff for carrying out a decree from a judge, just because he had notice of an appeal.
The Court's Decision
The Court found that an attachment would not apply to the sheriff.
See also
References
- ↑ William Hening and William Munford, Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia: with Select Cases, Relating Chiefly to Points of Practice, Decided by the Superior Court of Chancery for the Richmond District, 2nd ed. (Flatbush: I. Riley, 1809), 209.
