Difference between revisions of "Cowles v. Brown"
(Created page with "{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Cowles v. Brown''}} File:CallsReports1833V4CowlesvBrown.pdf|link=Media:CallsReports1833V4CowlesvBrown.pdf|thumb|right|300px|First page of the opinion [[Medi...") |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Cowles v. Brown''}} | {{DISPLAYTITLE:''Cowles v. Brown''}} | ||
| − | [[File:CallsReports1833V4CowlesvBrown. | + | [[File:CallsReports1833V4CowlesvBrown.jpg|link=Media:CallsReports1833V4CowlesvBrown.pdf|thumb|right|300px|First page of the opinion [[Media:CallsReports1833V4CowlesvBrown.pdf|''Cowles v. Brown'']], in [https://catalog.swem.wm.edu/law/Record/2099031 ''Reports of Cases Argued and Decided in the Court of Appeals of Virginia''], by Daniel Call. Richmond: R. I. Smith, 1833.]] |
| − | |||
[[Media:CallsReports1833V4CowlesvBrown.pdf|''Cowles v. Brown'']], Call Vol. IV 477 (1803), <ref>Daniel Call, ''[[Reports of Cases Argued and Decided in the Court of Appeals of Virginia]],'' (Richmond: R. I. Smith, 1833), 477.</ref> was a case determining whether a father, who agreed in his marriage settlement to divide his wife’s slaves among his children how he saw fit, could in turn sell those slaves for a profit. | [[Media:CallsReports1833V4CowlesvBrown.pdf|''Cowles v. Brown'']], Call Vol. IV 477 (1803), <ref>Daniel Call, ''[[Reports of Cases Argued and Decided in the Court of Appeals of Virginia]],'' (Richmond: R. I. Smith, 1833), 477.</ref> was a case determining whether a father, who agreed in his marriage settlement to divide his wife’s slaves among his children how he saw fit, could in turn sell those slaves for a profit. | ||
| Line 14: | Line 13: | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
| − | + | __NOTOC__ | |
| − | |||
[[Category: Cases]] | [[Category: Cases]] | ||
| + | [[Category: Slavery]] | ||
Revision as of 09:44, 25 February 2018
Cowles v. Brown, Call Vol. IV 477 (1803), [1] was a case determining whether a father, who agreed in his marriage settlement to divide his wife’s slaves among his children how he saw fit, could in turn sell those slaves for a profit.
Background
A property dispute where the terms of a marriage agreement devised several slaves to Susanna Cooper’s husband upon her death. According to the agreement, Mr. Cooper was to divide the slaves among his children in any way he felt was proper. However, after the death of his wife, Mr. Cooper sold some of the slaves and bartered others with several people including Brown. Brown also happened to be the executor of Mr. Cooper’s estate.
The Court's Decision
Chancellor Wythe decided that John Cooper’s sale of the slaves was valid and dismissed the petition with costs. The Court of Appeals affirmed.
See also
References
- ↑ Daniel Call, Reports of Cases Argued and Decided in the Court of Appeals of Virginia, (Richmond: R. I. Smith, 1833), 477.
