Difference between revisions of "Mutual Assurance Co. v. Mahon"
From Wythepedia: The George Wythe Encyclopedia
(Created page with "{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Mutual Assurance Co. v. Mahon''}} File:WytheAmblerVWyld1852.jpg|link=Media:CallsReports1833V5MutualAssuranceCovMahon.pdf |thumb|right|300px|First page of...") |
Mvanwicklin (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Mutual Assurance Co. v. Mahon''}} | {{DISPLAYTITLE:''Mutual Assurance Co. v. Mahon''}} | ||
| − | [[File:WytheAmblerVWyld1852.jpg|link= | + | [[File:WytheAmblerVWyld1852.jpg|link={{filepath:CallsReports1833V5MutualAssuranceCovMahon.pdf}}|thumb|right|300px|First page of the opinion [[Media:CallsReports1833V5MutualAssuranceCovMahon.pdf |''Mutual Assurance Co. v. Mahon'']], in [https://catalog.swem.wm.edu/law/Record/2099031 ''Reports of Cases Argued and Decided in the Court of Appeals of Virginia''], by Daniel Call. Richmond: R. I. Smith, 1833.]] |
| − | [[Media:CallsReports1833V5MutualAssuranceCovMahon.pdf|''Mutual Assurance Co. v. Mahon'']], 9 Va. (5 Call) 517 (1805), <ref>Daniel Call, ''Reports of Cases Argued and Decided in the Court of Appeals of Virginia,''(Richmond: R. I. Smith, 1833), 5:517.</ref> is a case determining whether leasehold tenements were insurable by a specific | + | [[Media:CallsReports1833V5MutualAssuranceCovMahon.pdf|''Mutual Assurance Co. v. Mahon'']], 9 Va. (5 Call) 517 (1805),<ref>Daniel Call, ''Reports of Cases Argued and Decided in the Court of Appeals of Virginia,''(Richmond: R. I. Smith, 1833), 5:517.</ref> is a case determining whether leasehold tenements were insurable by a specific insurance company. |
| − | |||
==Background== | ==Background== | ||
| − | Mahon leased an improved lot in Norfolk for £30 per year for ten years. In his lease, Mahon was at liberty to remove the houses he erected on the land, which was usual for leases in Norfolk at the time. In this case, Mahon had built a house and kitchen on the leased property which he insured with the defendant, Mutual Assurance Company. After insuring the dwelling the place accidentally caught on fire | + | Mahon leased an improved lot in Norfolk for £30 per year for ten years. In his lease, Mahon was at liberty to remove the houses he erected on the land, which was usual for leases in Norfolk at the time. In this case, Mahon had built a house and kitchen on the leased property which he insured with the defendant, Mutual Assurance Company. After insuring the dwelling the place accidentally caught on fire; however, the insurance company refused to pay the insured sum claiming they did not know Mahon leased the property and that their company only insured fee simple tenements, not leased tenements. Mahon sued in the Superior Court of Chancery to obtain payment for the insured sum and general relief. |
===The Court's Decision=== | ===The Court's Decision=== | ||
Chancellor Wythe decreed payment for the insured sum with interest. The Court of Appeals reversed and annulled the decision and order it be remanded to Court of Chancery for a separate account to be taken. | Chancellor Wythe decreed payment for the insured sum with interest. The Court of Appeals reversed and annulled the decision and order it be remanded to Court of Chancery for a separate account to be taken. | ||
Revision as of 09:59, 20 July 2018
First page of the opinion Mutual Assurance Co. v. Mahon, in Reports of Cases Argued and Decided in the Court of Appeals of Virginia, by Daniel Call. Richmond: R. I. Smith, 1833.
Mutual Assurance Co. v. Mahon, 9 Va. (5 Call) 517 (1805),[1] is a case determining whether leasehold tenements were insurable by a specific insurance company.
Background
Mahon leased an improved lot in Norfolk for £30 per year for ten years. In his lease, Mahon was at liberty to remove the houses he erected on the land, which was usual for leases in Norfolk at the time. In this case, Mahon had built a house and kitchen on the leased property which he insured with the defendant, Mutual Assurance Company. After insuring the dwelling the place accidentally caught on fire; however, the insurance company refused to pay the insured sum claiming they did not know Mahon leased the property and that their company only insured fee simple tenements, not leased tenements. Mahon sued in the Superior Court of Chancery to obtain payment for the insured sum and general relief.
The Court's Decision
Chancellor Wythe decreed payment for the insured sum with interest. The Court of Appeals reversed and annulled the decision and order it be remanded to Court of Chancery for a separate account to be taken.
See also
References
- ↑ Daniel Call, Reports of Cases Argued and Decided in the Court of Appeals of Virginia,(Richmond: R. I. Smith, 1833), 5:517.
