Difference between revisions of "Hadfield v. Jameson"
From Wythepedia: The George Wythe Encyclopedia
(Created page with "{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Hadfield v. Jameson''}} File:Munfords_Reports1814V2HadfieldvJameson.pdf|link=Media:Munfords_Reports1814V2HadfieldvJameson.pdf|thumb|right|300px|First page o...") |
m |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Hadfield v. Jameson''}} | {{DISPLAYTITLE:''Hadfield v. Jameson''}} | ||
− | [[File:Munfords_Reports1814V2HadfieldvJameson. | + | [[File:Munfords_Reports1814V2HadfieldvJameson.jpg|link=Media:Munfords_Reports1814V2HadfieldvJameson.pdf|thumb|right|300px|First page of the opinion [[Media:Munfords_Reports1814V2HadfieldvJameson.pdf|''Hadfield v. Jameson'']], in [http://wm-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/01COWM_WM:EVERYTHING:01COWM_WM_ALMA21560678820003196 ''Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia''], by William Munford. New York: I. Riley, 1814.]] |
− | [[Media:Munfords_Reports1814V2HadfieldvJameson.pdf|''Hadfield v. Jameson'']], Munford Vol. II 53 (1809),<ref>William Munford, '' | + | [[Media:Munfords_Reports1814V2HadfieldvJameson.pdf|''Hadfield v. Jameson'']], Munford Vol. II 53 (1809),<ref>William Munford, ''Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia,'' (New York: I. Riley, 1814), 2:53.</ref> was a maritime attachment case. |
==Background== | ==Background== | ||
Robert Brown Jameson & Co. brought a maritime attachment against Joseph Hadfield to garnish payment for the freight and insurance of a ship called Favorite. | Robert Brown Jameson & Co. brought a maritime attachment against Joseph Hadfield to garnish payment for the freight and insurance of a ship called Favorite. | ||
+ | |||
===The Court's Decision=== | ===The Court's Decision=== | ||
Chancellor Wythe affirmed the decree of the county court of Fairfax. The Court of Appeals reversed both decrees and dismissed the case in favor of the appellant. | Chancellor Wythe affirmed the decree of the county court of Fairfax. The Court of Appeals reversed both decrees and dismissed the case in favor of the appellant. | ||
+ | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
*[[Wythe's Judicial Career]] | *[[Wythe's Judicial Career]] |
Revision as of 14:19, 4 March 2018
Hadfield v. Jameson, Munford Vol. II 53 (1809),[1] was a maritime attachment case.
Background
Robert Brown Jameson & Co. brought a maritime attachment against Joseph Hadfield to garnish payment for the freight and insurance of a ship called Favorite.
The Court's Decision
Chancellor Wythe affirmed the decree of the county court of Fairfax. The Court of Appeals reversed both decrees and dismissed the case in favor of the appellant.
See also
References
- ↑ William Munford, Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia, (New York: I. Riley, 1814), 2:53.