Difference between revisions of "Law of Ejectments"

From Wythepedia: The George Wythe Encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 18: Line 18:
 
}}
 
}}
  
 +
This tome covered the now archaic law of ejectments. <ref> [http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=eebo;idno=A49745.0001.001]</ref> Ejectment is the common law term for civil action to recover the possession of or title to land. It replaced the old real actions as well as the various possessory assizes. <ref>Ibid.</ref> Though still used in some places, the term is now obsolete in many common law jurisdictions, in which possession and title are contested via the actions of eviction and quiet title, respectively. Originally, an ejectment was concerned with the recovery of possession of land, for example against a defaulting tenant or a trespasser, who did not have (or no longer had) any right to remain there. It has continued to be used for this, though in some jurisdictions the terminology has changed.<ref>Ibid.</ref>
 
==Evidence for Inclusion in Wythe's Library==
 
==Evidence for Inclusion in Wythe's Library==
  

Latest revision as of 12:12, 9 October 2015


The Law of Ejectments
George Wythe bookplate.jpg
Title not held by The Wolf Law Library
at the College of William & Mary.
 
Author
Editor
Translator
Published London:
Date 1700
Edition
Language
Volumes volume set
Pages
Desc.


This tome covered the now archaic law of ejectments. [1] Ejectment is the common law term for civil action to recover the possession of or title to land. It replaced the old real actions as well as the various possessory assizes. [2] Though still used in some places, the term is now obsolete in many common law jurisdictions, in which possession and title are contested via the actions of eviction and quiet title, respectively. Originally, an ejectment was concerned with the recovery of possession of land, for example against a defaulting tenant or a trespasser, who did not have (or no longer had) any right to remain there. It has continued to be used for this, though in some jurisdictions the terminology has changed.[3]

Evidence for Inclusion in Wythe's Library

See also

References

  1. [1]
  2. Ibid.
  3. Ibid.