Difference between revisions of "Yerby v. Yerby"
From Wythepedia: The George Wythe Encyclopedia
Mvanwicklin (talk | contribs) m |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Yerby v. Yerby''}} | {{DISPLAYTITLE:''Yerby v. Yerby''}} | ||
| − | [[File:CallYerbyvYerby1854v3p334.jpg|link={{filepath:CallsReports1854V3YerbyvYerby.pdf}}|thumb|right|300px|First page of the opinion [[Media:CallsReports1854V3YerbyvYerby.pdf |''Yerby v. Yerby'']], in [https:// | + | [[File:CallYerbyvYerby1854v3p334.jpg|link={{filepath:CallsReports1854V3YerbyvYerby.pdf}}|thumb|right|300px|First page of the opinion [[Media:CallsReports1854V3YerbyvYerby.pdf |''Yerby v. Yerby'']], in [https://wm-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=01COWM_WM_ALMA21773388600003196&context=L&vid=01COWM_WM_NEWUI&search_scope=EVERYTHING&tab=default_tab&lang=en_US ''Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Court of Appeals of Virginia''], by Daniel Call, ed. by Lucian Minor, 3rd ed. Richmond: A. Morris, 1854.]] |
| − | In [[Media:CallsReports1854V3YerbyvYerby.pdf |''Yerby v. Yerby'']], 7 Va. (3 Call) 344 (1803),<ref>Daniel Call, ''Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Court of Appeals of Virginia,'' | + | In [[Media:CallsReports1854V3YerbyvYerby.pdf |''Yerby v. Yerby'']], 7 Va. (3 Call) 344 (1803),<ref>Daniel Call, ''Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Court of Appeals of Virginia,'' ed. by Lucian Minor, 3rd ed. (Richmond: A. Morris, 1854), 3:344. George Wythe owned the [[Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Court of Appeals of Virginia|first edition]] of this set.</ref> the Court determined whether a statute enabled two children from a man’s second marriage to revoke a will he wrote in his first. |
| + | |||
==Background== | ==Background== | ||
| − | In May 1790, George Yerby, a widower with six children, married Elizabeth Rust. During their marriage, the Yerbys had two children, William and Mary. When Elizabeth died, George became very sick and promised to include William and Mary in his will once his health recovered. However, it never did. George died leaving William and Mary penniless. The siblings brought this case in the Court of Chancery to obtain equity from a legislative statute. The statute stated that testators whose wills did not include any children or provide for children born after their death would be void. The statute then called for the estate to be split equally between each child. The case was first heard in a lower level court. The lower court found no grounds to adjust the will and give William and Mary relief. | + | In May 1790, George Yerby, a widower with six children, married Elizabeth Rust. During their marriage, the Yerbys had two children, William and Mary. When Elizabeth died, George became very sick and promised to include William and Mary in his will once his health recovered. However, it never did. George died leaving William and Mary penniless. The siblings brought this case in the Court of Chancery to obtain equity from a legislative statute. The statute stated that testators whose wills did not include any children or provide for children born after their death would be void. The statute then called for the estate to be split equally between each child. The case was first heard in a lower level court. The lower court found no grounds to adjust the will and give William and Mary relief. |
| + | |||
===The Court's Decision=== | ===The Court's Decision=== | ||
| − | When Chancellor Wythe heard the case, he dismissed it for lack of jurisdiction. The siblings appealed that decision to the Court of Appeals, who affirmed. | + | When [[George Wythe|Chancellor Wythe]] heard the case, he dismissed it for lack of jurisdiction. The siblings appealed that decision to the Court of Appeals, who affirmed. |
| + | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
*[[Wythe's Judicial Career]] | *[[Wythe's Judicial Career]] | ||
| Line 14: | Line 17: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
[[Category: Cases]] | [[Category: Cases]] | ||
| + | [[Category: Inheritance]] | ||
Latest revision as of 13:39, 5 April 2019
First page of the opinion Yerby v. Yerby, in Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Court of Appeals of Virginia, by Daniel Call, ed. by Lucian Minor, 3rd ed. Richmond: A. Morris, 1854.
In Yerby v. Yerby, 7 Va. (3 Call) 344 (1803),[1] the Court determined whether a statute enabled two children from a man’s second marriage to revoke a will he wrote in his first.
Background
In May 1790, George Yerby, a widower with six children, married Elizabeth Rust. During their marriage, the Yerbys had two children, William and Mary. When Elizabeth died, George became very sick and promised to include William and Mary in his will once his health recovered. However, it never did. George died leaving William and Mary penniless. The siblings brought this case in the Court of Chancery to obtain equity from a legislative statute. The statute stated that testators whose wills did not include any children or provide for children born after their death would be void. The statute then called for the estate to be split equally between each child. The case was first heard in a lower level court. The lower court found no grounds to adjust the will and give William and Mary relief.
The Court's Decision
When Chancellor Wythe heard the case, he dismissed it for lack of jurisdiction. The siblings appealed that decision to the Court of Appeals, who affirmed.
See also
References
- ↑ Daniel Call, Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Court of Appeals of Virginia, ed. by Lucian Minor, 3rd ed. (Richmond: A. Morris, 1854), 3:344. George Wythe owned the first edition of this set.
