Difference between revisions of "Johnson v. Brown"

From Wythepedia: The George Wythe Encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Johnson v. Brown''}} File:CallsReports1854V3JohnsonvBrown.pdf|link=Media:CallsReports1854V3JohnsonvBrown.pdf|thumb|right|300px|First page of the opinion [[M...")
 
m
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Johnson v. Brown''}}
 
{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Johnson v. Brown''}}
[[File:CallsReports1854V3JohnsonvBrown.pdf|link=Media:CallsReports1854V3JohnsonvBrown.pdf|thumb|right|300px|First page of the opinion [[Media:CallsReports1854V3JohnsonvBrown.pdf|''Johnson v. Brown'']], in [https://catalog.swem.wm.edu/law/Record/2099031 ''Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Court of Appeals of Virginia''], by Daniel Call. 3rd ed. Richmond: A. Morris, 1854.]]
+
[[File:CallJohnsonvBrown-21854v3p259.jpg|link={{filepath:CallsReports1854V3JohnsonvBrown.pdf}}|thumb|right|300px|First page of the opinion [[Media:CallsReports1854V3JohnsonvBrown.pdf|''Johnson v. Brown'']], in [https://wm.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01COWM_INST/g9pr7p/alma991006014269703196 ''Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Court of Appeals of Virginia''], by Daniel Call. 3rd ed. Richmond: A. Morris, 1854.]]
  
[[Media:CallsReports1854V3JohnsonvBrown.pdf|''Johnson v. Brown'']], Call Vol. III 227 (1802),<ref>Daniel Call, ''[[Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Court of Appeals of Virginia]],'' 3rd ed., ed. Lucian Minor (Richmond: A. Morris, 1854), 227.</ref> is a case where the Court determined who would recover when two surveys were made for the same property and both were recorded.  
+
[[Media:CallsReports1854V3JohnsonvBrown.pdf|''Johnson v. Brown'']], 7 Va. (3 Call) 259 (1802),<ref>Daniel Call, ''[[Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Court of Appeals of Virginia]],'' 3rd ed., ed. Lucian Minor (Richmond: A. Morris, 1854), 3:259.</ref> is a case where the Court determined who would recover when two surveys were made for the same property and both were recorded.  
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
==Background==
 
==Background==
Line 18: Line 18:
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
[[Category: Cases]]
 
[[Category: Cases]]
 +
[[Category: Real Property]]

Latest revision as of 12:13, 7 September 2023

First page of the opinion Johnson v. Brown, in Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Court of Appeals of Virginia, by Daniel Call. 3rd ed. Richmond: A. Morris, 1854.

Johnson v. Brown, 7 Va. (3 Call) 259 (1802),[1] is a case where the Court determined who would recover when two surveys were made for the same property and both were recorded.

Background

On November 20, 1749, William Davies surveyed 300 acres for his father, Robert Davies. On August 29, 1753, Robert sold the survey to J. Philips, who bestowed the land to his son. On May 23, 1789, Johnson purchased the land from Philip's son. On October 12, 1789, Johnson was also assigned the land from William Davies, paying £4 for consideration. On June 9th, 1792, the Land Office issued a formal patent of the purchase. In 1753, John Brown obtained a patent for 230 acres of land, 190 acres of which were included in Johnson’s patent. Brown sued Johnson in the High Court of Chancery for conveyance of the 190 acres.

The Court's Decision

Chancellor Wythe decreed in favor of Brown. The Court of Appeals unanimously affirmed.

See also

References

  1. Daniel Call, Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Court of Appeals of Virginia, 3rd ed., ed. Lucian Minor (Richmond: A. Morris, 1854), 3:259.