Difference between revisions of "Bedford v. Hickman"
From Wythepedia: The George Wythe Encyclopedia
(Created page with "{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Bedford v. Hickman''}} File:CallsReports1833V5BedfordvHickman.pdf |link=Media:CallsReports1833V5BedfordvHickman.pdf |thumb|right|300px|First page of t...") |
m |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Bedford v. Hickman''}} | {{DISPLAYTITLE:''Bedford v. Hickman''}} | ||
| − | [[File: | + | [[File:CallBedfordvHickman1833v5p236.jpg|link={{filepath:CallsReports1833V5BedfordvHickman.pdf}}|thumb|right|300px|First page of the opinion [[Media:CallsReports1833V5BedfordvHickman.pdf |''Bedford v. Hickman'']], in [https://wm.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01COWM_INST/g9pr7p/alma991006014269703196 ''Reports of Cases Argued and Decided in the Court of Appeals of Virginia''], by Daniel Call. Richmond: R. I. Smith, 1833.]] |
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
| − | [[Media:CallsReports1833V5BedfordvHickman.pdf|''Bedford v. Hickman'']], Call | + | [[Media:CallsReports1833V5BedfordvHickman.pdf|''Bedford v. Hickman'']], 9 Va. (Call 5) 236 (1804) <ref>Daniel Call, ''Reports of Cases Argued and Decided in the Court of Appeals of Virginia,''(Richmond: R. I. Smith, 1833), 5:236.</ref> involved whether a purchaser could be relieved from a contract granting a certain amount of land, but subsequently giving significantly less acreage. |
==Background== | ==Background== | ||
| − | Hickman bought a tract of land from Bedford for “900 acres, more or less.” The purchase was | + | Hickman bought a tract of land from Bedford for “900 acres, more or less.” The purchase price was £1300, £650 of which was paid in cash and the other half in bond. Since purchasing the property, Hickman discovered that the deed for the tract contained only 709 acres; a follow-up survey showed 765 acres. Hickman sued Bedford for fraud claiming that Bedford knew the amount of land and did not inform Hickman. He requested the court allow the £650 to suffice as full payment for the property and dismiss the injunction on the bond. |
===The Court's Decision=== | ===The Court's Decision=== | ||
| − | The | + | The County Court granted a perpetual injunction in favor of Hickman. Chancellor Wythe affirmed the decree, which the Court of Appeals affirmed. |
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
[[Category: Cases]] | [[Category: Cases]] | ||
| + | [[Category: Contracts]] | ||
Latest revision as of 11:21, 7 September 2023
First page of the opinion Bedford v. Hickman, in Reports of Cases Argued and Decided in the Court of Appeals of Virginia, by Daniel Call. Richmond: R. I. Smith, 1833.
Bedford v. Hickman, 9 Va. (Call 5) 236 (1804) [1] involved whether a purchaser could be relieved from a contract granting a certain amount of land, but subsequently giving significantly less acreage.
Background
Hickman bought a tract of land from Bedford for “900 acres, more or less.” The purchase price was £1300, £650 of which was paid in cash and the other half in bond. Since purchasing the property, Hickman discovered that the deed for the tract contained only 709 acres; a follow-up survey showed 765 acres. Hickman sued Bedford for fraud claiming that Bedford knew the amount of land and did not inform Hickman. He requested the court allow the £650 to suffice as full payment for the property and dismiss the injunction on the bond.
The Court's Decision
The County Court granted a perpetual injunction in favor of Hickman. Chancellor Wythe affirmed the decree, which the Court of Appeals affirmed.
See also
References
- ↑ Daniel Call, Reports of Cases Argued and Decided in the Court of Appeals of Virginia,(Richmond: R. I. Smith, 1833), 5:236.
