Difference between revisions of "Cheshire v. Atkinson"
From Wythepedia: The George Wythe Encyclopedia
m (→The Court's Decision) |
Mvanwicklin (talk | contribs) m |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Cheshire v. Atkinson''}} | {{DISPLAYTITLE:''Cheshire v. Atkinson''}} | ||
| − | [[File: | + | [[File:HeningMunfordCheshirevAtkinson1809v2p209.jpg|link={{filepath:Hening&MunfordsReports1809V1ChesirevAtkinson.pdf}}|thumb|right|300px|First page of the opinion [[Media:Hening&MunfordsReports1809V1ChesirevAtkinson.pdf|''Cheshire v. Wyld'']], in [http://wm-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/01COWM_WM:EVERYTHING:01COWM_WM_ALMA21593279330003196 ''Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia: with Select Cases, Relating Chiefly to Points of Practice, Decided by the Superior Court of Chancery for the Richmond District''], by William Hening and William Munford. 2nd ed. Flatbush: I. Riley, 1809.]] |
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
| − | [[Media:Hening&MunfordsReports1809V1ChesirevAtkinson.pdf|''Cheshire v. Atkinson'']], | + | [[Media:Hening&MunfordsReports1809V1ChesirevAtkinson.pdf|''Cheshire v. Atkinson'']], 11 Va. (1 Hen. & M.) 209 (1807),<ref>William Hening and William Munford, ''Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia: with Select Cases, Relating Chiefly to Points of Practice, Decided by the Superior Court of Chancery for the Richmond District,'' 2nd ed. (Flatbush: I. Riley, 1809), 1:209.</ref> the court determined whether a sheriff could be attached for carrying out a decree from a judge, although the sheriff knew the case was pending appeal. |
==Background== | ==Background== | ||
A very brief case where the court determined that the plaintiff could not bring an attachment against a sheriff for carrying out a decree from a judge, just because he had notice of an appeal. | A very brief case where the court determined that the plaintiff could not bring an attachment against a sheriff for carrying out a decree from a judge, just because he had notice of an appeal. | ||
| + | |||
===The Court's Decision=== | ===The Court's Decision=== | ||
The Court found the attachment proceeding would not apply against the sheriff. | The Court found the attachment proceeding would not apply against the sheriff. | ||
| Line 14: | Line 15: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
[[Category: Cases]] | [[Category: Cases]] | ||
| + | [[Category: Procedure]] | ||
Latest revision as of 13:41, 30 July 2018
First page of the opinion Cheshire v. Wyld, in Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia: with Select Cases, Relating Chiefly to Points of Practice, Decided by the Superior Court of Chancery for the Richmond District, by William Hening and William Munford. 2nd ed. Flatbush: I. Riley, 1809.
Cheshire v. Atkinson, 11 Va. (1 Hen. & M.) 209 (1807),[1] the court determined whether a sheriff could be attached for carrying out a decree from a judge, although the sheriff knew the case was pending appeal.
Background
A very brief case where the court determined that the plaintiff could not bring an attachment against a sheriff for carrying out a decree from a judge, just because he had notice of an appeal.
The Court's Decision
The Court found the attachment proceeding would not apply against the sheriff.
See also
References
- ↑ William Hening and William Munford, Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia: with Select Cases, Relating Chiefly to Points of Practice, Decided by the Superior Court of Chancery for the Richmond District, 2nd ed. (Flatbush: I. Riley, 1809), 1:209.
