Difference between revisions of "Cheshire v. Atkinson"
From Wythepedia: The George Wythe Encyclopedia
(Created page with "{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Cheshire v. Atkinson''}} File:Hening&MunfordsReports1809V1ChesirevAtkinson.pdf|link=Media:Hening&MunfordsReports1809V1ChesirevAtkinson.pdf|thumb|right|300px...") |
m (→The Court's Decision) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
A very brief case where the court determined that the plaintiff could not bring an attachment against a sheriff for carrying out a decree from a judge, just because he had notice of an appeal. | A very brief case where the court determined that the plaintiff could not bring an attachment against a sheriff for carrying out a decree from a judge, just because he had notice of an appeal. | ||
===The Court's Decision=== | ===The Court's Decision=== | ||
| − | The Court found | + | The Court found the attachment proceeding would not apply against the sheriff. |
| + | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
*[[Wythe's Judicial Career]] | *[[Wythe's Judicial Career]] | ||
Revision as of 13:28, 15 December 2017
File:Hening&MunfordsReports1809V1ChesirevAtkinson.pdf
Cheshire v. Atkinson, Hening & Munford Vol. I 209 (1807),[1] the court determined whether a sheriff could be attached for carrying out a decree from a judge, although the sheriff knew the case was pending appeal.
Background
A very brief case where the court determined that the plaintiff could not bring an attachment against a sheriff for carrying out a decree from a judge, just because he had notice of an appeal.
The Court's Decision
The Court found the attachment proceeding would not apply against the sheriff.
See also
References
- ↑ William Hening and William Munford, Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia: with Select Cases, Relating Chiefly to Points of Practice, Decided by the Superior Court of Chancery for the Richmond District, 2nd ed. (Flatbush: I. Riley, 1809), 209.
