View source for Bolling v. Bolling

''Bolling v. Bolling'' (1780-1781) centered on a familial disagreement over inheritance that was referred from the [[Virginia General Court]] to arbitration before Benjamin Waller. The dispute involved the will of Edward Bolling and was brought by his brother Archibald Baldwin against another brother, Robert Bolling, who had probated the will and acted as executor. The notes incorporating the arguments in this case are important for their revealing insight into the state of early American law, as viewed and used by attorneys at the time, and because the plaintiff and defendant were represented, respectively, by [[George Wythe]] and his former student [[Thomas Jefferson]].

== Factual Background ==

The Bollings.

=== Edward Bolling's Will ===

== The Issues ==

The arguments made by Wythe for the plaintiff and Jefferson for the defendant revolve around two separate issues before the arbitrator. 

First, the parties disputed whether the defendant, Robert Bolling, was entitled to the crops growing on Buffalo Lick plantation, which had been devised to him by Edward, at the time of Edward's death. Wythe argued instead that the crops should pass to the plaintiff, Archibald Bolling, as the residuary legatee to the will, as part of Edward's personal estate. 

Second, the parties disagreed as to whether Edward's gift of his "book" to the defendant, Robert, was a legacy to him as executor of the surplus of the amounts credited to Edward after Edward's debts at his death had been paid.  In the alternative, Wythe urged that the surplus was an undisposed part of Edward's personal property that should pass under the will's residual clause to the plaintiff, Archbald. 

== The Case ==

Archibald brought this case as a Chancery suit in the Virginia General Court, from which it was referred to arbitration because of its complex issues. The General Court was composed of members of the Governor's Council and were, according to Jefferson, "chosen from among the gentlemen of the country, for their wealth and standing, without any regard to legal knowledge." <ref>Jefferson's Reports, 5.</ref> In arbitration, the the case would be heard by an actual lawyer capable of appreciating and interpreting the complications of common law inheritance and property law.
 
== Arbitration ==

Jefferson's Case Book reports that a case was referred to Benjamin Waller, acting as arbitrator. <ref> Jefferson Case Book, no. 233</ref> Waller was the clerk of the General Court and would later become a judge himself. 

=== Wythe's First Argument for Plaintiff ===

=== Jefferson's First Argument for Defendant ===

=== Wythe's Second Argument for Plaintiff ===

=== Jefferson's Second Argument for Defendant ===

=== Wythe's Reply for Plaintiff ===

== Historical Importance of Case ==

Rare insight into how practitioners used early Anglo-American law. The work of lawyers was rarely recorded in this detail. 

The arguments are sophisticated and highly technical, involving interpretations of existing property and inheritance law. 

George Wythe as attorney rather than judge. 

Thomas Jefferson's brilliance as advocate.

Wythe and Jefferson facing off against each another as having historical and biographical importance.

== Jefferson's Notes == 

Brief explanation of Jefferson's notes.

<references/>