Difference between revisions of "Wythe to John Hatley Norton, 4 December 1785"
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
1769 to a fee for prosecuting your suits against Holt Richeson 2.15.0<br /> | 1769 to a fee for prosecuting your suits against Holt Richeson 2.15.0<br /> | ||
to a fee for prosecuting your suit against Whitinge and Clayton 2.12.6<br /> | to a fee for prosecuting your suit against Whitinge and Clayton 2.12.6<br /> | ||
− | 1770 to a fee for prosecuting your suit against Boswell 2.12.6<br /> | + | 1770 to a fee for prosecuting your suit against Boswell 2.12.6<br /> |
to a fee for defending you at the suit of Booker in Chancery<br /> | to a fee for defending you at the suit of Booker in Chancery<br /> | ||
Why the last article was not carried out, i do not recollect. but the amount of the others very nearly equals the balance with which i stand charged in the books J. Norton & sons. <br /> | Why the last article was not carried out, i do not recollect. but the amount of the others very nearly equals the balance with which i stand charged in the books J. Norton & sons. <br /> |
Revision as of 14:08, 20 September 2013
To
John Hatley Norton esq;
Winchester
Dear Sir
On My books is stated an account as below:
dr. John Norton eq. in account with George Wythe-
1769 to a fee for prosecuting your suits against Holt Richeson 2.15.0
to a fee for prosecuting your suit against Whitinge and Clayton 2.12.6
1770 to a fee for prosecuting your suit against Boswell 2.12.6
to a fee for defending you at the suit of Booker in Chancery
Why the last article was not carried out, i do not recollect. but the amount of the others very nearly equals the balance with which i stand charged in the books J. Norton & sons.
be pleased to let me know if this is satisfactory or not.
present my good wishes to mrs. Norton and her young ladies; and believe me to be,
Dear Sir
Your friend
G. Wythe
4 dec. 1785
Your letter dated 2d July came to hand Near the last of November.