Difference between revisions of "Orandorf v. Welch"
Mnumberger (talk | contribs) (Adding photo of Orandorf's Petition of Appeal) |
Mnumberger (talk | contribs) (Fixed verb tense issues) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==Background== | ==Background== | ||
| − | Michael Welch sued Orandorf and the representatives of Henry Cookus in Berkeley County Court. A decree from the court set aside Orandorf’s purchase contract for property in Berkeley County, and Orandorf alleged the property | + | Michael Welch sued Orandorf and the representatives of Henry Cookus in Berkeley County Court. A decree from the court had set aside Orandorf’s purchase contract for property in Berkeley County, and Orandorf's petition alleged the property had been purchased fairly and his firm contract set aside without notice. |
| − | Orandorf alleged manifest error in the court’s decree and argued that even if Orandorf | + | Orandorf's petition alleged manifest error in the court’s decree and argued that even if Orandorf had not been a resident of Berkeley County -- which Orandorf insisted was untrue -- Orandorf had had no time to set aside the decree, as allowed by the law in the cases of decrees against non-residents. Additionally, Welch had offered no security in the absence of an opportunity to set aside the decree. |
Orandorf petitioned for an appeal from the decree to the High Court of Chancery and asked the Court to issue a supersedeas bond to reverse and supersede enforcement of the decree. | Orandorf petitioned for an appeal from the decree to the High Court of Chancery and asked the Court to issue a supersedeas bond to reverse and supersede enforcement of the decree. | ||
Revision as of 12:37, 14 November 2017
Orandorf v. Welch (February 18, 1791) is a brief decision by Wythe as Judge of the Hight Court of Chancery granting Orandorf's Petition of Appeal and awarding the petitioner a supersedeas bond.[1]
Background
Michael Welch sued Orandorf and the representatives of Henry Cookus in Berkeley County Court. A decree from the court had set aside Orandorf’s purchase contract for property in Berkeley County, and Orandorf's petition alleged the property had been purchased fairly and his firm contract set aside without notice.
Orandorf's petition alleged manifest error in the court’s decree and argued that even if Orandorf had not been a resident of Berkeley County -- which Orandorf insisted was untrue -- Orandorf had had no time to set aside the decree, as allowed by the law in the cases of decrees against non-residents. Additionally, Welch had offered no security in the absence of an opportunity to set aside the decree.
Orandorf petitioned for an appeal from the decree to the High Court of Chancery and asked the Court to issue a supersedeas bond to reverse and supersede enforcement of the decree.
The Court's Decision
With minimal discussion, Wythe granted the petition of appeal and awarded Orandorf a supersedeas bond, with surety, in the penalty of £100.
See also
References
- ↑ Petition of Appeal by Christian Orandorf (Feb. 18, 1791) (on file with the Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections, The John M. Woolsey Collection of Legal Documents, Box 1, Documents in the Case of Orandorf v. Welch with signatures of George Wythe and John Marshall), available at http://archives.law.virginia.edu/records/mss/78-6/digital/1114.
