Difference between revisions of "Tomlinson v. Dillard"

From Wythepedia: The George Wythe Encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Taylor's Admin v. Nicolson''}} File:WytheAmblerVWyld1852.jpg|link=Media:Hening&MunfordsReports1809V1Taylor'sAdminvNicolson.pdf ‎|thumb|right|300px|First p...")
 
m
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Taylor's Admin v. Nicolson''}}
+
{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Tomlinson v. Dillard''}}
[[File:WytheAmblerVWyld1852.jpg|link=Media:Hening&MunfordsReports1809V1Taylor'sAdminvNicolson.pdf ‎|thumb|right|300px|First page of the opinion [[Media:Hening&MunfordsReports1809V1Taylor'sAdminvNicolson.pdf ‎|''Taylor's Admin v. Nicolson'']], in [https://catalog.swem.wm.edu/law/Record/2099031 ''Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia: With Select Cases, Relating Chiefly to Points of Practice, Decided by the Superior Court of Chancery for the Richmond District''], by William Hening and William Munford. Flatbush: I. Riley, 1809.]]
+
[[File:WytheAmblerVWyld1852.jpg|link=Media:CallsReports1854V3TomlinsonvDillard.pdf ‎|thumb|right|300px|First page of the opinion [[Media:CallsReports1854V3TomlinsonvDillard.pdf ‎|''Tomlinson v. Dillard'']], in [https://catalog.swem.wm.edu/law/Record/2099031 ''Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Court of Appeals of Virginia''], by Daniel Call.  3rd ed., ed. Lucian Minor. Richmond: A. Morris, 1854.]]
[[Media:Hening&MunfordsReports1809V1Taylor'sAdminvNicolson.pdf ‎|''Taylor's Admin. v. Nicolson'']], 11 Va. (1 Hen. & M.) 66 (1806),<ref>William Hening and William Munford, ''Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Virginia: With Select Cases, Relating Chiefly to Points of Practice, Decided by the Superior Court of Chancery for the Richmond District,''(Flatbush, N.Y.: I. Riley, 1809), 1:66.</ref> was a case where the court determined whether there were legal grounds to set aside an arbitration award.
+
In [[Media:CallsReports1854V3TomlinsonvDillard.pdf ‎|''Tomlinson v. Dillard'']], 7 Va. (3 Call) 93 (1801),<ref>Daniel Call, ''Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Court of Appeals of Virginia,''3rd ed., ed. Lucian Minor. (Richmond: A. Morris, 1854), 3:93.</ref> the court determined whether the mother of a deceased infant was entitled to any part of the estate the son inherited from his father.
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
==Background==
 
==Background==
Taylor and Nicolson entered a partnership to lease “Manchester Mills”. Under their Articles of Co-partnership, if one partner died prior to the lease’s expiration, the surviving partner could purchase the remainder of the lease for a price determined through arbitration. Taylor died before the lease expired and Nicolson sought to buy Taylor’s portion of the lease. Following the terms of the agreement, Taylor’s Administrator and Nicolson chose three arbitrators to determine the buying price. The arbitrators found Taylor’s portion of the lease to be worth £595. However, the arbitrators based the award on the condition that George Mayo, the lessor, waive any future liability on Taylor's estate. Although George agreed to these terms, Taylor’s Administrator sued Nicolson arguing that the award should be set aside because the arbitrators departed from the terms of the arbitration, the rates used to determine the award were usurious, and the award lacked mutuality.
+
On February 1, 1791, Benjamin Tomlinson died leaving a will where he gave his pregnant wife, Nancy Edloe Tomlinson, his property and devised to his future child the rest of his estate. After Benjamin’s death, Nancy birthed a son named Benjamin Edloe Tomlinson. In 1798, Nancy remarried George Dillard. On September 3 of the same year, Benjamin Edloe Tomlinson died at just 18 months. Not long after, Nancy also died. Benjamin Tomlinson’s siblings and their descendants brought this case against George Dillard to recover Benjamin’s land.  
 
===The Court's Decision===
 
===The Court's Decision===
Chancellor Wythe dismissed the request to set aside the award. Wythe then decreed that Taylor's Estate should receive the sum of the award, with interest after deducting Nicolson's costs in defending the suit. The Court of Appeals affirmed.
+
Chancellor Wythe, was of the opinion that the mother succeeded the slaves and personal estate of the infant, at his death. Consequently, Wythe determined that that George Dillard through marriage, was also entitled to the estate. Wythe dismissed the case with court costs. Benjamin Tomlinson's siblings appealed the decision and the Court of Appeals reversed.
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
 
*[[Wythe's Judicial Career]]
 
*[[Wythe's Judicial Career]]

Revision as of 12:42, 9 May 2018

First page of the opinion Tomlinson v. Dillard, in Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Court of Appeals of Virginia, by Daniel Call. 3rd ed., ed. Lucian Minor. Richmond: A. Morris, 1854.

In Tomlinson v. Dillard, 7 Va. (3 Call) 93 (1801),[1] the court determined whether the mother of a deceased infant was entitled to any part of the estate the son inherited from his father.

Background

On February 1, 1791, Benjamin Tomlinson died leaving a will where he gave his pregnant wife, Nancy Edloe Tomlinson, his property and devised to his future child the rest of his estate. After Benjamin’s death, Nancy birthed a son named Benjamin Edloe Tomlinson. In 1798, Nancy remarried George Dillard. On September 3 of the same year, Benjamin Edloe Tomlinson died at just 18 months. Not long after, Nancy also died. Benjamin Tomlinson’s siblings and their descendants brought this case against George Dillard to recover Benjamin’s land.

The Court's Decision

Chancellor Wythe, was of the opinion that the mother succeeded the slaves and personal estate of the infant, at his death. Consequently, Wythe determined that that George Dillard through marriage, was also entitled to the estate. Wythe dismissed the case with court costs. Benjamin Tomlinson's siblings appealed the decision and the Court of Appeals reversed.

See also

References

  1. Daniel Call, Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Court of Appeals of Virginia,3rd ed., ed. Lucian Minor. (Richmond: A. Morris, 1854), 3:93.