Difference between revisions of "Hill v. Gregory"

From Wythepedia: The George Wythe Encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Maze v. Hamilton''}}
+
{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Hill v. Gregory''}}
 
''Hill v. Gregory'', Wythe 73 (1790), was a case that discussed whether a creditor could choose how to apply a payment among a debtor's different accounts in the absence of specific directions from the debtor.<ref>George Wythe, ''Decisions of Cases in Virginia by the High Court of Chancery,'' (Richmond: Printed by Thomas Nicolson, 1795), 73.</ref>
 
''Hill v. Gregory'', Wythe 73 (1790), was a case that discussed whether a creditor could choose how to apply a payment among a debtor's different accounts in the absence of specific directions from the debtor.<ref>George Wythe, ''Decisions of Cases in Virginia by the High Court of Chancery,'' (Richmond: Printed by Thomas Nicolson, 1795), 73.</ref>
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__

Revision as of 15:31, 5 August 2013

Hill v. Gregory, Wythe 73 (1790), was a case that discussed whether a creditor could choose how to apply a payment among a debtor's different accounts in the absence of specific directions from the debtor.[1]


Background

Wythe's Discussion

References

  1. George Wythe, Decisions of Cases in Virginia by the High Court of Chancery, (Richmond: Printed by Thomas Nicolson, 1795), 73.