Hawkins's Ex'ors v. Minor, Ex'or of Berkeley

From Wythepedia: The George Wythe Encyclopedia
Revision as of 17:21, 20 November 2017 by Drbordley (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Hawkins's Ex'ors v. Minor, Ex'or of Berkeley''}} File:CallsReports1833V5Hawkin'sEx'orsvMinor,Ex'orofBerkeley.pdf|link=Media:CallsReports1833V5Hawkin'sEx'ors...")

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

File:CallsReports1833V5Hawkin'sEx'orsvMinor,Ex'orofBerkeley.pdf

Hawkins's Ex'ors v. Minor, Ex'or of Berkeley, Call Vol. V 118 (1804),[1] was a case involving a creditor who hired his debtor to collect his other debts, but failed to receive the money from his collection.

Background

Hawkins owed money to Berkeley. However the two agreed that is Hawkins paid a portion of his debt, Berkeley would hire him to collect his other debts. For every debt Hawkins collected, the amount would be deducted from Hawkins’ debt as well. Hawkins gave his bond to Berkeley for the amount of £1000 and, per the agreement, Berkeley delivered to Hawkins a list of names of other bonds owed and commissioned Berkeley to be his personal debt collector. Hawkins received some collections, handed some cases over to attorney for suit, but failed to render an account to Berkeley regarding the collections prior to his death. Berkeley sued Hawkins’ executors for the money and obtained a judgment against them. However, Hawkins’ executors then filed suit against Berkeley for an injunction alleging that Berkeley had already been paid and that certain collections (such as those given to attorneys) were not chargeable to Hawkins.

The Court's Decision

Chancellor Wythe directed that an account be taken, upon which there was a balance reported against Berkley’s executor of about £412. The Chancellor decreed that the sum and interest starting from November 16, 1795 be paid to Hawkins. The Court of Appeals found that the Chancellor erred in his calculations and that multiple factors should be considered upon remand including the subtraction of interest accumulated during the Revolutionary War and money borrowed against the estate from the Hawkins’ Executors.

See also

References

  1. Daniel Call, Reports of Cases Argued and Decided in the Court of Appeals of Virginia, (Richmond: R. I. Smith, 1833), 118.