Difference between revisions of "Governor Thomas Jefferson to the Virginia Delegates in Congress, 15 March 1781"

From Wythepedia: The George Wythe Encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
<div align="center">(''From Executive Letter Book, 1781, p. 184.'')<br /></div>
 
<div align="center">(''From Executive Letter Book, 1781, p. 184.'')<br /></div>
  
The Honble [sic] Virginia Delegates in Congress
+
The Honble [''sic''] Virginia Delegates in Congress
<div align="right">In Council March 15th 1781.<br /></div>  
+
<div align="right">In Council March 15<sup>th</sup> 1781.<br /></div>  
 
''Gentlemen''
 
''Gentlemen''
  
A Difference of opinion having taken place between the Executive of this State and Mr Simon Nathan as to the rate at which certain Bills of exchange should be discharged in paper money we have agreed with him to refer it to such Gentlemen of Knowledge in the Laws of established Character & of any other State as yourselves shall mutually agree on with him.  Their award shall be performed by the State, which means to stand in the place as well of the Drawer as Drawee.  Mr Wilson & Mr Serjeant had been consulted by Mr Nathan.  
+
A Difference of opinion having taken place between the Executive of this State and M<sup>r</sup> Simon Nathan as to the rate at which certain Bills of exchange should be discharged in paper money we have agreed with him to refer it to such Gentlemen of Knowledge in the Laws of established Character & of any other State as yourselves shall mutually agree on with him.  Their award shall be performed by the State, which means to stand in the place as well of the Drawer as Drawee.  M<sup>r</sup> Wilson & M<sup>r</sup> Serjeant had been consulted by M<sup>r</sup> Nathan.  
  
I inclose [sic] to you Mr Pendleton’s and Wythe’s Opinion.  You will be pleased to observe that the State of the Case requires from Mr Nathan actual proof that he took up the Bills at par.  Mr Nathan having agreed with us all the facts as stated, I am to suppose nothing contrary to them will be received, as his Signature here was omitted perhaps it would be best for you to require it before submission.  It is not our Desire to pay off those Bills according to the present Depreciation but according to their actual value in hard money at the time they were drawn with Interest.  The State having received value so far as it is just it should be substantially paid.  All beyond this would be plunder made by some person or other.  The Executive in the most candid manner departed from the advantage which their Tender law gave them in the beginning.  It seems very hard to make this the means of obtaining an unjust Gain from the State.
+
I inclose [''sic''] to you M<sup>r</sup> Pendleton’s and Wythe’s Opinion.  You will be pleased to observe that the State of the Case requires from M<sup>r</sup> Nathan actual proof that he took up the Bills at par.  M<sup>r</sup> Nathan having agreed with us all the facts as stated, I am to suppose nothing contrary to them will be received, as his Signature here was omitted perhaps it would be best for you to require it before submission.  It is not our Desire to pay off those Bills according to the present Depreciation but according to their actual value in hard money at the time they were drawn with Interest.  The State having received value so far as it is just it should be substantially paid.  All beyond this would be plunder made by some person or other.  The Executive in the most candid manner departed from the advantage which their Tender law gave them in the beginning.  It seems very hard to make this the means of obtaining an unjust Gain from the State.

Revision as of 16:47, 18 October 2018

Letter text, March 15, 1780

GOV. JEFFERSON TO THE VIRGINIA DELEGATES IN CONGRESS.
(From Executive Letter Book, 1781, p. 184.)

The Honble [sic] Virginia Delegates in Congress

In Council March 15th 1781.

Gentlemen

A Difference of opinion having taken place between the Executive of this State and Mr Simon Nathan as to the rate at which certain Bills of exchange should be discharged in paper money we have agreed with him to refer it to such Gentlemen of Knowledge in the Laws of established Character & of any other State as yourselves shall mutually agree on with him. Their award shall be performed by the State, which means to stand in the place as well of the Drawer as Drawee. Mr Wilson & Mr Serjeant had been consulted by Mr Nathan.

I inclose [sic] to you Mr Pendleton’s and Wythe’s Opinion. You will be pleased to observe that the State of the Case requires from Mr Nathan actual proof that he took up the Bills at par. Mr Nathan having agreed with us all the facts as stated, I am to suppose nothing contrary to them will be received, as his Signature here was omitted perhaps it would be best for you to require it before submission. It is not our Desire to pay off those Bills according to the present Depreciation but according to their actual value in hard money at the time they were drawn with Interest. The State having received value so far as it is just it should be substantially paid. All beyond this would be plunder made by some person or other. The Executive in the most candid manner departed from the advantage which their Tender law gave them in the beginning. It seems very hard to make this the means of obtaining an unjust Gain from the State.