Difference between revisions of "George Wythe: Early Modern Judge"

From Wythepedia: The George Wythe Encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{DISPLAYTITLE:"George Wythe: Early Modern Judge"}}
 
{{DISPLAYTITLE:"George Wythe: Early Modern Judge"}}
"George Wythe: Early Modern Judge"<ref>Wythe Holt, "George Wythe: Early Modern Judge," ''Alabama Law Review'' 58, no. 5 (2007), 1009-1039.</ref> is a 2007 law review article written by University Research Professor Emeritus, Wythe Holt, Jr. (a descendent of Wythe's sister), for a legal history symposium in his honor. Holt considers four opinions by [[George Wythe|Wythe]]: ''[[Commonwealth v. Caton]], Page v. Pendleton, Pleasants v. Pleasants,'' and ''Hudgins v. Wrights.''
+
"George Wythe: Early Modern Judge"<ref>Wythe Holt, [[http://www.law.ua.edu/pubs/lrarticles/Volume%2058/Issue%205/Holt.pdf "George Wythe: Early Modern Judge,"]] ''Alabama Law Review'' 58, no. 5 (2007), 1009-1039.</ref> is a 2007 law review article written by University Research Professor Emeritus, Wythe Holt, Jr. (a descendent of Wythe's sister), for a legal history symposium in his honor. Holt considers four opinions by [[George Wythe|Wythe]]: ''[[Commonwealth v. Caton]], Page v. Pendleton, Pleasants v. Pleasants,'' and ''Hudgins v. Wrights.''
  
 
==References==
 
==References==

Revision as of 13:28, 22 February 2014

"George Wythe: Early Modern Judge"[1] is a 2007 law review article written by University Research Professor Emeritus, Wythe Holt, Jr. (a descendent of Wythe's sister), for a legal history symposium in his honor. Holt considers four opinions by Wythe: Commonwealth v. Caton, Page v. Pendleton, Pleasants v. Pleasants, and Hudgins v. Wrights.

References

  1. Wythe Holt, ["George Wythe: Early Modern Judge,"] Alabama Law Review 58, no. 5 (2007), 1009-1039.

External links

Read this article at the Alabama Law Review.