Browne v. Turberville

From Wythepedia: The George Wythe Encyclopedia
Revision as of 17:31, 6 November 2017 by Drbordley (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Browne v. Turberville''}} File:CallsReports1854V2BrownevTurberville.pdf ‎|link=Media:CallsReports1854V2BrownevTurberville.pdf ‎|thumb|right|300px|First...")

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

File:CallsReports1854V2BrownevTurberville.pdf

Browne v. Turberville, Call Vol. II 329 (1800),[1] was a case involving the distribution of an intestate estate.

Background

In 1796, George Waugh who had reached the age of maturity, died without a will and was unmarried. Prior to his death, Waugh obtained property from both his deceased father and his deceased, unmarried brother. The issue before the court was how the remainder of Waugh's estate should be distributed to his surviving relatives.

The Court's Decision

Chancellor Wythe determined that estate should be divided into two moieties. One to Waugh’s mother’s side and the other to his father’s. The Court of Appeals affirmed.

See also

References

  1. Daniel Call, Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Court of Appeals of Virginia, 3rd ed., ed. Lucian Minor (Richmond: A. Morris, 1854), 329.